Search for: "Lord v. Smith"
Results 321 - 340
of 467
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2016, 5:49 am
The role of the adviser or assessor is set out in Halliburton v Smith [2006] EWCA Civ 1599. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 10:46 am
This reasoning was, of course, nothing new and was summarised by the eminent Lord Hoffmann in Synthon BV v Smith Kline Beecham plc:"…the matter relied upon as prior art must disclose subject-matter which, if performed, would necessarily result in an infringement of the patent. [read post]
12 Jan 2020, 4:32 pm
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia On 6 January 2020, Besanko J gave judgment in the case of Roberts-Smith v Fairfax Media Publications [2020] FCA 2 dismissing an application for disclosure of confidential sources. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 4:33 pm
Cambridge v Makin, heard 8 to 12 November 2010 (Tugendhat J) Pritchard Englefield & anr v Steinberg heard 19 November 2010 (Eady J) Wallis & anr v Meredith heard 29 November and 1 December 2010 (Christopher Clarke J) Smith v ADVFN Plc & ors heard 3 December 2010 (Tugendhat J) [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 3:17 am
Next Week in the Courts On Monday 13 December 2010, Mr Justice Tugendhat will give judgment in the case of Smith v ADVFN Plc & ors (heard on 3 December 2010). [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 4:05 pm
His Norfolk host Vaughan Smith told Newsweek “I think it would be foolish to determine WikiLeaks is over. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 7:46 am
Ministerial communications: s.35(1)(b) and the convention of collective responsibility Imogen Bickford-Smith v IC EA/2010/0032, EIR 2004, reg 5(1) (whether information held), regs 12 and 13 (personal data) Surrey Heath Borough Council & Keith McCullen v IC EA/2010/0034. [read post]
24 Nov 2019, 4:08 pm
On 26 November 2019 there will be an application in the case of Kirkegaard v Smith. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 12:24 pm
(Reardon Smith Line, at p. 574, per Lord Wilberforce) (Check for commentary on CanLII Connects) Bato v Cano, 2023 ABCJ 114 [10] I am satisfied that what is commonly referred to as “cock fighting” is illegal in Canada, and while there is ample argument on behalf of the Plaintiff to suggest that this activity is legal in the Philippines, I am not in a position to conclude that. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 3:30 pm
Notably, Lord Bingham’s judgment began:“A general public duty to house the homeless or provide for the destitute cannot be spelled out of article 3. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 12:39 am
Smith & Ors v Ministry of Defence [2011] EWHC 1676 (QB) (30 June 2011): Human rights claims of 6 soldiers killed or injured in Iraq allegedly due to faulty equipment/ poor training struck out following decision in R(Smith) in Supreme Court. [read post]
1 Dec 2019, 4:05 pm
On the same day Julian Knowles J heard the trial in the case of Kirkegaard v Smith. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 5:46 am
Smith’s song is ecstatic and soaring, and Mr. [read post]
2 Dec 2024, 1:37 am
Last week in the courts The trial in the case of Smith & Jackson v Surridge (QB-2022-000858) before Saini J began on 25 November and is set to continue until 3 December 2024. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 11:56 pm
MARTYN SMITH v PRESS ASSOCIATION LTD 4/2/2010 45. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 4:33 pm
This was made clear in the recent case of Doyle v Smith – this concerned a “citizen journalist” who had his own blog the “Caddington News”. [read post]
3 May 2011, 1:32 am
This came to a head in the furore over the former Archbishop of Canterbury’s intervention in the MacFarlane v Relate case, provoking some very sharp words from Lord Justice Laws. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 11:46 am
” United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 1:08 pm
This was summarised during questions to the Home Office minister in the House of Lords in 2003:Lord Lester of Herne Hill asked her Majesty's Government: Whether denying prisoners the right to vote affects their ability to persuade Ministers of the Crown and those responsible for the Prison Service to improve the conditions in which they are imprisoned; and whether denying prisoners the right to vote amounts to an additional punishment; and whether this is compatible with… [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 5:25 pm
Justyna Zeromska-Smith v Lincolnshire Hospitals NHS Trust [2019] EWHC 552 (QB) The claimant sued for clinical negligence that caused psychiatric injury following a stillbirth for which the NHS trust admitted responsibility. [read post]
