Search for: "M/V Lord"
Results 321 - 340
of 914
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2007, 12:27 pm
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------LORD JUSTICE KEENEMRS JUSTICE DOBBS DBEMR JUSTICE WALKER R -v- JACK TURNER DANIEL-LANCE SAUMUELS Crown copyright ©1. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 7:15 am
Lord v. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 3:59 am
Case comment by Elizabeth-Anne Gumbel QC and Justin Levinson (Barristers for the Claimant, MAGA) MAGA v The Trustees of the Birmingham Archdiocese of the Roman Catholic Church [2010] EWCA Civ 256, Court of Appeal (Lord Neuberger MR, Lord Justice Longmore and Lady Justice Smith) (read judgment) This appeal was brought with permission from the trial Judge Mr Justice Jack. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 3:44 pm
So, I’m an impure property lawyer and quite proud of it. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 2:08 am
Levine Samuel, LLP Gerald M. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 6:46 am
The case you are thinking of is M v Hammersmith & Fulham LBC [2008] UKHL 14, [2008] 1 WLR 535. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 6:46 am
The case you are thinking of is M v Hammersmith & Fulham LBC [2008] UKHL 14, [2008] 1 WLR 535. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 1:41 pm
This week there are three linked appeals to be heard in the Supreme Court from Monday 14 March to Thursday 17 March 2011 by Lords Phillips, Hope and Rodger, Lady Hale and Lords Clarke, Brown and Dyson: R (Cart) v The Upper Tribunal; Eba v Advocate General for Scotland (Scotland); and R (MR (Pakistan)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 8:53 am
Baroness Hale (with whom Lords Hope and Walker agreed) gave the leading judgment; Lord Rodger gave a concurring judgment, out of deference to the CA; and Lord Brown doubted the result but, in the oddest final paragraph, basically said that he didn’t care enough to dissent (“At the end of the day, however, I do not feel sufficiently strongly as to the proper outcome of the appeal to carry these doubts to the point of dissent. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 1:00 am
On Monday 19 June, the Supreme Court will hear the appeals of R v M; R v C; R v T. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 2:07 pm
Malcolm is headed to the Lords and frankly, I don’t think anyone expects the Lords to leave it alone, so there is no doubt more to come. [read post]
3 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
In Loving v. [read post]
8 May 2011, 3:25 pm
TG, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Lambeth (Shelter Intervening) [2011] EWCA Civ 526 The disconnection between Local Authority Social Services and housing departments has been a frequent topic here and in the courts, not least in the House of Lords decisions in R (G) v Southwark LBC [2009] UKHL 26 and R (M) v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC [2008] UKHL 14. [read post]
8 May 2011, 3:25 pm
TG, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Lambeth (Shelter Intervening) [2011] EWCA Civ 526 The disconnection between Local Authority Social Services and housing departments has been a frequent topic here and in the courts, not least in the House of Lords decisions in R (G) v Southwark LBC [2009] UKHL 26 and R (M) v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC [2008] UKHL 14. [read post]
28 May 2009, 11:52 pm
Yes, criminal defendants are going to lose some too -- like Michigan v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 4:48 am
R (Smith) v Secretary of State for Defence & Anor [2010] UKSC 29 JUDGMENT The Supreme Court allowed the appeal on the jurisdiction issue (Lady Hale, Lord Mance and Lord Kerr dissenting) and unanimously dismissed the appeal on the inquest issue. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 4:48 pm
On 28 February 2020 the Lord Chief Justice, Lord Burnett, gave his annual press conference. [read post]
7 May 2013, 4:00 am
The House of Lords put this nicely in Hilton v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 6:26 am
Black v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:52 pm
The importance of national precedent in such situations, per Lord Bingham in Kay v LB Lambeth [2006] UKHL 10, was crucial. [read post]
