Search for: "MARK AGRAVES"
Results 321 - 340
of 734
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jan 2014, 5:30 am
Computer and Internet Law Weekly Updates for 2014-01-11: Court addresses whether a limit of liability clause c… http://t.co/3h4Tx2FgbJ -> The Simpsons “Steal This”, an Episode about Copyright http://t.co/LWPi4O2lFR -> The Treacherous Gap Between Goods and Services in Trade-marks Law | snIP/ITs http://t.co/CHQeobE3Fo -> Getty & AFP Appeal $1.2 Million Copyright Infringement Verdict – PetaPixel http://t.co/XSue6Wkg0k -> Dude, You Can't Copyright That… [read post]
19 Jan 2020, 4:50 pm
Huntington, Charles Crocker, Mark Hopkins and of course Leland Stanford, for whom Leland Stanford Google University is named. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 10:18 am
Mark Lemley: Why now? [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 3:20 pm
For the most part, the difference between singular and plural is not marked. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 6:09 am
Voilà. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:55 pm
Informed user The Court recalled settled case law, according to which the concept of ‘informed user’ lies somewhere between the ‘average consumer’ in trade mark matters (who need not have any specific knowledge and makes no direct comparison between the trade marks) and the ‘sectoral expert’ (who is an expert with detailed technical expertise). [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 2:53 pm
Some brand owners would go as far as trying to secure trade mark registrations for their store layouts (e.g. the tech giant Apple (see IPKat post here)). [read post]
14 Dec 2014, 2:04 pm
I am similarly happy with a Dixon Ticonderoga HB 2, which seems to remove more of the mark. [read post]
18 May 2017, 11:01 am
So we tried the equivalent of the following: “Fred* Smyth” and voilà! [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 12:22 pm
Oppositions like this also play an important role in protecting and enhancing the value of celebrity brands vis-à-vis encouraging third parties to seek licenses rather than roll the dice with an unauthorized use of a celebrity persona. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 4:00 am
The recent history of judicial review in Canada has been marked by ebbs and flows of deference, confounding tests and new words for old problems, but no solutions that provide real guidance for litigants, counsel, administrative decision makers or judicial review judges. [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 7:02 pm
More than exposed, 2019 marked their explosion, the aftermath of which, in 2020, will be marked by the start of a variety of end games in law, society, politics, culture and economics. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 5:58 am
Federal Court decision in trade mark infringement case Atomic Energy of Canada Limited v Areva NP Canada Ltd and Société des Participations du Commissariat à L’énergie Atomique (Excess Copyright) Europe ECJ decision in PAGO International GmbH v Tirolmilch registrierte Genossenschaft mbH trade marl case: Austria is as significant as bits of Benelux (IPKat) Flugbörse appeal flies off to the ECJ (Class 46) Yet… [read post]
10 May 2013, 8:01 pm
O garoto, personagem de As Aventuras de Huckleberry Finn, livro escrito por Mark Twain em 1884, nunca conheceu sua mãe e era constantemente abandonado por seu pai. [read post]
10 May 2013, 8:01 pm
O garoto, personagem de As Aventuras de Huckleberry Finn, livro escrito por Mark Twain em 1884, nunca conheceu sua mãe e era constantemente abandonado por seu pai. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 4:59 am
It is a right of use that exists vis-à-vis other persons, n exclusive right, but a relative one. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 9:03 pm
An earlier statement from Agricola Tre Valli said the voluntary withdrawal involved some hot dogs with the CE mark IT 04 M but production was continuing. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 9:00 pm
An earlier statement from Agricola Tre Valli said the voluntary withdrawal involved some hot dogs with the CE mark IT 04 M but production was continuing. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 6:57 am
N'hésitez pas à me prévenir en cas d'erreurs ou d'oublis afin que je puisse le cas échéant corriger le classement. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 6:02 am
The essential elements of a licence (the licensee’s right to use the trade mark – in this case ‘Lensworld’ – itself on a commercial basis and to defend it vis-à-vis third parties) were absent, however. [read post]
