Search for: "MARK GRAY v. THE STATE" Results 321 - 340 of 458
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Aug 2010, 3:46 am by Susan Brenner
The Court finds that the thrust of [Doyle’s] loss assessment misses the mark. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 12:58 am by Kelly
– All-Party Parliamentary IP Group (IPKat) United States US General On hiring an employee of your competitor: Bimbo Bakeries v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 1:25 am by Kelly
The Glad Products Company et al (Docket Report) Simonian - False patent marking standing motion decided without briefing: Simonian v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 12:39 am by Kelly
Phoenix Fence Company (Docket Report) District Court E D Pennsylvania: False marking intent to deceive cannot be inferred from knowledge of the limited duration of patents and expiration of marked patents: Hollander v. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 4:35 am by INFORRM
After hearing the strike out application in the case of Kaschke v Gray, (see judgment [2010] EWHC 690 (QB)) Mr Justice Stadlen reserved judgment this week. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 5:46 am by Marie Louise
The Hain Celestial Group, Inc (Docket Report) District Court N D Texas: False marking intent to deceive may be inferred from marking of expired patent numbers: Patent Compliance Group Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 7:19 am
- Viacom v YouTube opinion lacks heft (Shades of Gray)   US Copyright – Lawsuits and strategic steps Capitol Records - Labels and Thomas-Rasset agree: we won’t settle (Copyrights & Campaigns) (ArsTechnica) Gatehouse Media - New copyright lawsuit involves Creative Commons: GateHouse Media Inc v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 6:04 pm by Duncan
– Viacom v YouTube opinion lacks heft (Shades of Gray) US Copyright – Lawsuits and strategic steps Capitol Records – Labels and Thomas-Rasset agree: we won’t settle (Copyrights & Campaigns) (ArsTechnica) Gatehouse Media – New copyright lawsuit involves Creative Commons: GateHouse Media Inc v. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 7:50 pm
(Maier & Maier)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Defendant may defeat false patent marking claim by showing no intent to deceive: Pequignot v Solo Cup Company (IP Spotlight) (Patently-O) (GRAY on Claims) (Florida IP) (Inventive Step) Two Strykes and you're out - Fed. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 11:05 pm
United States (Gray on Claims) CAFC: Orion v Hyundai on novelty: Expanding the scope of a printed publication with oral testimony (Patently-O) District Court N D Illinois: False marking includes marking with expired patent number: ZOJO Solutions Inc. v. [read post]
29 May 2010, 6:33 am by thejaghunter
Calkins, Richfield Springs, NY GMG3 Daniel Homicki, Elizabeth, NJ OS3 Lee Stephens, Pemberton, OH SN Mark R. [read post]
18 May 2010, 1:10 am
 (Gray on Claims) District Court N D California: Compliance with accused industry standard does not justify joinder of defendants in a single action: Finisar Corporation v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 3:01 am
(IAM)   US Trade Marks – Decisions 9th Circuit finds ‘Would you rather? [read post]