Search for: "MATTER OF C B J B" Results 321 - 340 of 3,043
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jan 2013, 4:00 am by INFORRM
(c)  In how many libel appeals did Eady J, Tugendhat J or Sharp J appear on the panel? [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
This case considered whether the Court of Appeal was correct to hold that the appellants’ arrests and detention were lawful under ECHR, art 5(1)(c) or alternatively under art 5(1)(b). [read post]
26 May 2015, 8:19 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Green: yes, b/c we believed it was necessary. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 3:41 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
The firm: They don’t have the externalities problem b/c they internalize benefits of buying. [read post]
9 Sep 2018, 5:29 am
The correct decision here will also matter a lot. [read post]
1 Dec 2013, 11:00 am by Dave
 In essence, the question for Stuart-Smith J was whether that change was an abuse of power. [read post]
1 Dec 2013, 11:00 am by Dave
 In essence, the question for Stuart-Smith J was whether that change was an abuse of power. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 9:43 pm by Badrinath Srinivasan
(c) However, Section 42 only applies to applications made under Part-I if they are made to a court as defined. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 2:46 am
Thus some extraneous matter, beyond the mark as registered, could be taken into account. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
J 10/07, T 1366/04, T 1279/05). [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 12:35 pm by PJ Blount
(c) Section 44303(b) of such title is amended by striking ‘June 30, 2010,’ and inserting ‘September 30, 2010,’. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 9:16 am by Dennis Crouch
 Kraft Food Brands Group LLC, No 16-341 (Does the general and broad definition of “residence” found in 28 U.S.C. 1391(c) apply to the patent venue statute 1400(b)) Civil Procedure – Personal Jurisdiction: Mylan Pharmaceuticals, et al. v. [read post]