Search for: "MATTER OF N C F"
Results 321 - 340
of 2,134
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jan 2022, 3:47 am
Therefore, the Board held that “[i]n matters of trademark registration and maintenance, where the USPTO relies on declarations to be complete, accurate, and truthful . . . reckless disregard is equivalent to intent to deceive and satisfies the intent to deceive requirement. [read post]
27 Dec 2021, 8:20 am
This is especially so when neither parent demonstrates bad faith,” and that “[n]o matter the outcome, one party’s life will likely be affected detrimentally. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 5:01 am
In another comment, defendant declared that "[i]f [District Attorney Welch] won't do anything, then the death to her as well. [read post]
19 Dec 2021, 8:16 pm
§§ 3729(a)(1)(C). [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 1:40 pm
See Comm’n Opinion, In the Matter of Certain Microfluidic Devices, USITC Inv. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 2:22 pm
Corp., 244 F. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 1:09 pm
Patent and Trademark Office interprets this to mean no, never, no matter what. 15 U.S.C. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 12:53 pm
It echoes the philosophy of John C. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 10:52 am
Explanatory Reports Garcimartín Alférez, Francisco; Saumier, Geneviève „Convention of 2 July 2019 on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters: Explanatory Report“, as approved by the HCCH on 22 September 2020 (available here) Garcimartín Alférez, Francisco; Saumier, Geneviève “Judgments Convention: Revised Draft Explanatory Report”, HCCH Prel. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 8:44 am
In this respect, requests for pseudonymity in such cases might not just be a matter of protecting privacy[7] but also be a matter of protecting reputation and preventing retaliation. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
Rylewicz, Civil Service Employees Association, Inc., Albany(Jennifer C. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
Rylewicz, Civil Service Employees Association, Inc., Albany(Jennifer C. [read post]
4 Dec 2021, 7:39 am
Hensley, 461 U.S. at 430 n.3. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 4:11 pm
Public Disclosure Comm'n v. 119 Vote No! [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 5:00 am
Woodstream, 232 F.R.D. 491, 493 n. 1 (E.D. [read post]
23 Nov 2021, 3:58 am
Explanatory Reports Garcimartín Alférez, Francisco; Saumier, Geneviève „Convention of 2 July 2019 on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters: Explanatory Report“, as approved by the HCCH on 22 September 2020 (available here) Garcimartín Alférez, Francisco; Saumier, Geneviève “Judgments Convention: Revised Draft Explanatory Report”, HCCH Prel. [read post]
21 Nov 2021, 9:00 pm
”[20] OSHA in the 1991 Standard relied on its reasoning from the 1978 Occupational Exposure to Lead Final Standard (the “1978 Standard”) where it rejected biological testing of workers as a means of monitoring employer compliance with occupational lead exposure limits.[21] In the 1978 Standard, OSHA concluded that “[a]ttempting to compel workers to subject themselves to detailed medical examinations presents the possibility of clashes with legitimate privacy and religious… [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 1:03 pm
Bd. of Bar Examiners, decided today by Magistrate Judge Steven C. [read post]
17 Nov 2021, 4:00 am
Binette, 2021 QCCA 1663 [28] En Cour supérieure, le juge a conclu que depuis l’arrêt Vavilov, il n’y a plus de déférence dans l’examen des décisions des tribunaux administratifs spécialisés lorsque le législateur a prévu un appel. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 9:52 am
But if the court really wants to keep the plaintiff's identity secret, then the witness would have to be put under some sort of protective order to remain quiet about that identity as well.[8] Many people are likely to resist becoming witnesses if that means agreeing to a protective order, at least if they have no personal stake in the matter. [read post]
