Search for: "MATTER OF R T"
Results 321 - 340
of 53,758
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm
[1.1] Under the provisions of R 111(2), appealable decisions must be reasoned. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 12:41 pm
I am excited about the Green Legal Matters conference in New Orleans this week. [read post]
6 Nov 2010, 12:00 pm
According to the established case law developed in relation to A 96(2) EPC 1973 and also applicable, as far as the issues raised by the appellant are concerned, to A 94(3), the expression “as often as necessary” in this article indicates that the ED has a discretion which has to be exercised objectively in the light of the circumstances of the case (see for instance decisions T 162/82 [12], T 300/89 [9.1], and T 726/04 [7]). [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 5:01 pm
However, as stated in T 763/04 [4.4], “A 113(1) is not a formal provision, but rather one of substance. [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 7:19 am
It is simply a matter of trust in the people executing the plan. [read post]
16 Jan 2023, 1:14 am
"Only the claims determine the extent of protection" (r. 3.16). [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 9:44 pm
Perhaps my favorite statement from Justice Troutman at 1:26:33: "So he complied until he didn't. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 7:25 am
CONGRESSIONAL PORK APOLOGISTS TELL US THAT EARMARKS DON’T MATTER BECAUSE THEY’RE A TINY FRACTION OF THE BUDGET: So why all the excitement about those AIG bonuses that represent only a tiny fraction of the bailout money? [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 11:50 am
Kelly doesn’t like to fly,” his lawyer told Judge Leinenweber. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 11:50 am
Kelly doesn’t like to fly,” his lawyer told Judge Leinenweber. [read post]
6 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm
That specific surface is measured by a single point method in accordance with JIS-R-1626 […]. [read post]
19 May 2017, 7:10 am
After T 910/03 it languished but occasionally reappeared.The Board refrains from referring the matter to the EBoA as it considers such referral not to be decisive in the present case, since according to the Board a same conclusion would be reached using both the essentiality test and the gold standard (being that the removal violates Art. 76(1) EPC).Entscheidungsgründe(...)2. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 12:00 am
As a result, practice will have to continue to deal with regulatory conflicts that are not resolvable as a matter of principle and therefore search for a practicable solution for the individual case at hand. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 5:02 am
She says "By 2039, the Supreme Court basically doesn’t matter anymore," but I guess it all depends on what "doesn't matter" means. [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 3:01 pm
The feature should allow to distinguish [the claimed subject-matter] from spheres or polyhedral shapes derived from spheres, which have no such circumferential face. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 7:00 am
Don't miss this issue. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 5:01 pm
Taking account of the structural formula of the imidazole given in D1, which comprises the two substituents R**(2) and R**(4), and the imidazole description in the English abstract it is clear that the imidazole can be substituted by alkyl groups in the imidazole positions 2 and 4, i.e. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 4:01 pm
T 228/89 [4.2] referring to T 5/81 [3]).[6.4] From these reasons it follows that the Board of Appeal has not decided “infra petita” and that the condition set out in R 104(b) is not met. [read post]
16 May 2013, 5:01 pm
T 1067/08 [7.2, 8.1]). [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 6:56 am
Plaintiff attempted to calendar the matter for a hearing, regardless of whether plaintiff hired an expert, the judge didn’t agree. [read post]
