Search for: "MATTER OF T A G"
Results 321 - 340
of 5,918
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2018, 7:25 am
A claim can cover much more than what it discloses, thus also embodiments which are not originally disclosed, but this is irrelevant for the evaluation of added subject matter. [read post]
15 May 2018, 7:25 am
A claim can cover much more than what it discloses, thus also embodiments which are not originally disclosed, but this is irrelevant for the evaluation of added subject matter. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 8:27 pm
By Steven G. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 3:01 pm
For this reason, decision G 9/91 and the ensuing case law of the boards of appeal (such as T 240/04 which was referred to by the respondent) which define the extent to which the factual framework may be changed in appeal proceedings are not applicable to the present case. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 1:54 pm
Mr G sought to appeal out of time. [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 3:01 pm
Such a patent can, therefore, only be maintained if there is a basis in the application as filed for replacing such subject-matter without violating A 123(3), i.e. for replacing the unallowable technical feature limiting the scope of protection conferred by the patent as granted with another technical feature which restricts the scope of the granted patent.Therefore, according to G 1/93 [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 5:54 am
In particular, the high-fat concentration of 40% had to be understood as meaning that the composition had a fat content of more than 30 g per 100 ml.The subject-matter of the method claim 20 lacked novelty over D1, D2, D21 and D22. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 9:49 am
This can be viewed as a 'generic "OR"-claim', in the language of G 2/98. [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 4:00 am
With regard to the appeal proceedings in case T 1807/15, the following is noted.IV. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 5:01 pm
However, the initial silicate concentration […] according to claim 6 of the patent is limited to “at most 15 g/l” whereas the independent process claim 1 of the application as filed only requires a value “less than 20 g/l”. [2.2] In application of the principle restated in T 925/98 [2] the Board considers that a limiting amendment consisting in a replacement of the upper limit “less than 20 g/l” of said range by the limit… [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 5:01 pm
In this context, the Enlarged Board of Appeal (EBA) has explained in its established case law that the main purpose of inter partes appeal proceedings is to give the losing party the opportunity of contesting the decision of the OD (G 9/91 and G 10/91; G 1/94). [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 3:01 pm
It also requested suspension of the proceedings in view of the then pending referral G 1/07 and OPs to be held in case the ED intended to refuse the application.On June 2007 the ED issued the impugned decision refusing the application. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 12:37 pm
Obviously, if you think that the Model Rule is too expansive, then you won’t like the ISBA proposal either. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 12:15 am
G 3/08, OJ EPO 2011, 10, reasons 12.2.2, T 1145/10 of 26 February 2016, reasons 5). [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 3:01 pm
The subject-matter of claim 1 is not restricted to a specific method of applying the vital dye. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 2:14 am
Although it can be a demanding intellectual exercise, the decisions reached in cases T 665/00, T 135/01, T 571/10 and T 1222/11 all show that it can be carried out without any need for additional tests or steps.6.7 From this analysis it follows that the assessment of entitlement to partial priority right does not show that any additional requirements are needed. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 12:33 pm
Don't be diverted by president's rhetoric, a reporter's trespass on the rules, or the president's walk-away without answering questions.What matters here is President Obama's enormous grab of power, and it is an... [read post]
6 Nov 2006, 6:47 am
In yesterday's Los Angeles Times, Jonathan Chait was assuring the Beltway-Manhatten media elite that the Kerry slander didn't matter. [read post]
27 Aug 2007, 8:08 am
I figure since I'm a well-known Romney shill, anything I say on the matter will grate on readers who don't suppor [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 8:37 am
" A: It doesn't matter. [read post]
