Search for: "MATTER OF T B" Results 321 - 340 of 20,007
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Oct 2008, 11:49 am
Part two then goes into the reality of running the B&B covering practical matters such as linen, keeping the room in readiness, bookings, taking payments, marketing, and of course the breakfasts. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 7:40 am by Matthew W. Homann
  Instead, identify two similar matters or clients (we'll call them A and B). [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 2:05 am by gmlevine
Theories of bad faith under subdivisions of paragraph 4(b) of the Policy have similarly been construed. [read post]
22 Sep 2019, 10:01 pm by Tom O'Connor
Don’t Get “Wild” with Wildcards: eDiscovery Throwback ThursdaysToday’s Webcast Will Show You How to Think Like a Millennial When Addressing eDiscovery Needs: eDiscovery Webcasts  [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 11:00 am by Oliver G. Randl
T 939/92 [2.5.3] or T 311/95 [2.5.7]). [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver
In respect of this subject-matter the question thus arises whether in the present case the test of R 28(d) should be applied per analogiam and/or whether the balancing test developed in decision T 19/90 and endorsed by decision T 315/03 should be applied under A 53(a). [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 1:00 am by Sander van Rijnswou
As neither the appellant nor respondent 1 had presented said matter in their submissions according to Article 12(1) and (2) RPBA, it was not within the scope of the present appeal. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Consequently, this feature leaves the actual subject-matter covered by the claim in doubt. [read post]
12 Jan 2018, 3:51 am by David
The holding is pretty simple:  an inventor who signs an employment agreement that provides (a) she “will assign” rights to inventions doesn’t then assign them; (b) that she “holds in trust” those rights doesn’t mean she assigns them; and (c) that she “quit claims” those rights doesn’t mean she assigns them. [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 4:00 pm
To download a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use this link: Matter of Female Infant B. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 10:29 am
Judge Clark granted AT&T's motion for judgment as a matter of law based on the first ground set forth above, on the ground that the card authorization amount in the AT&T System is linked before activation. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 8:30 am by Guest Author
”[4] Former Clinton Administration OIRA head Sally Katzen states that  “[t]he virtues of analysis—as robust as needed, commensurate with the significance of the decision being made—are, to me, self-evident: the regulator must think through, with all available data and in a systematic and disciplined way, all the intended and unintended consequences of a proposed rule. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Other decisions[1.4] Reference was made on behalf of the [opponents] to decisions T 1443/05, T 118/99, T 136/01 and T 494/03. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
A party is adversely affected if a decision does not accede to its requests (established jurisprudence; see T 961/00 [1]). [read post]