Search for: "MATTER OF T H"
Results 321 - 340
of 6,265
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2021, 4:45 am
H: Gender norms. [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 11:05 am
Sep't. 2, 2008) is an interesting First Amendment case. [read post]
16 Oct 2010, 11:01 am
A 84 stipulates that the claims shall define the matter for which protection is sought. [read post]
16 May 2023, 11:00 pm
H. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm
If a person is a professional representative, then his/her employment status simply should not matter. [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 5:59 am
Unfortunately for them, polar bears currently don’t have a vote in a jurisdiction that matters enough to anyone in power. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 4:43 am
H/T Venkat [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 7:03 am
The amendments to the Guidelines seems to reflect recent developments in case law, such as T 910/03 which questioned the applicability of T331/87. [read post]
14 May 2009, 12:35 am
According to Connie Wilhite, the EEOC lawyer in charge of the case, "It doesn't matter what industry you work in. [read post]
8 May 2016, 5:26 pm
So don’t try to shut folks out, don’t try to shut them down, no matter how much you might disagree with them. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 2:19 pm
(H/T Jottings blog) Long time readers of the blog may recall my discussion of the employer's summary judgment motion and the court's decision back in November 2007. [read post]
7 Nov 2021, 5:01 pm
The parties don’t agree as to exactly what H&M’s complaints have been – but in the Supreme Court H&M emphasizes allegations that some of the 31 designs had not been published on Jan. 15. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 7:06 pm
I don’t think that’s good karma anyway. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 10:27 am
At Joel H. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 2:12 pm
(Jonathan H. [read post]
28 Oct 2007, 7:25 pm
Serial: 143332IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPINo. 2007-DR-01759-SCTEARL WESLEYBERRYFILEDAppellantv.OCT t 82007OFFICE Of THE C,-H{KSTATE OF MISSISSIPPISUPREME COURT COURT Or-P.PPEALSAppelleeORDERThis matter is before the Coun on the Motion to Recuse OfficI;; uf the Attorney General and Appoint Special Counsel filed by Earl Wesley Berry and the Response filed by theState ofMississippi. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 11:17 am
If you need a criminal defense lawyer Contact David H. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 3:04 pm
And assuming they don’t, how would it ever enforce any non-disclosure agreements it may have with its own employees, contractors and others? [read post]
17 May 2010, 7:18 am
Darrin T. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 3:01 pm
G 1/93 [headnote 2] indicates a last possible way out:“A feature which has not been disclosed in the application as filed but which has been added to the application during examination and which, without providing a technical contribution to the subject-matter of the claimed invention, merely limits the protection conferred by the patent as granted by excluding protection for part of the subject-matter of the claimed invention as covered by the application as filed, is not to… [read post]
