Search for: "MATTER OF T H"
Results 321 - 340
of 6,268
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2023, 12:19 am
H. [read post]
12 May 2023, 11:45 am
For instance, in an order handed down earlier this year in Høeg v. [read post]
11 May 2023, 1:50 pm
by Neil H. [read post]
10 May 2023, 4:54 pm
As Justice Robert H. [read post]
9 May 2023, 3:58 am
Steven Thrasher, the Daniel H. [read post]
8 May 2023, 9:01 pm
The coins thus create an obligation on the government, which is what debt is, both as a matter of common sense and as defined by the debt ceiling statute.The platinum coin is not the only idea being sold as debt ceiling kryptonite. [read post]
8 May 2023, 4:01 am
The relatively small number of reported § 1118 cases in which courts have departed from the 9% statutory rate include Giaimo v Vitale (4%), Matter of Whalen (4%), Matter of Bambu Sales, Inc. (5.75%), and Matter of Fleischer (12%) — none of which explained how the court arrived at the chosen rate. [read post]
6 May 2023, 10:31 am
The authors of the report are essentially trying to argue that because MOHELA revenues are higher than they used to be, it does not matter that, without loan cancellation, they would be higher still. [read post]
4 May 2023, 8:47 am
SBA case law used to be unclear on this, noting that for instance, compliance with limitations on subcontracting “is a matter of contractor responsibility, beyond OHA’s jurisdiction. [read post]
3 May 2023, 11:08 am
by Neil H. [read post]
1 May 2023, 9:01 pm
It hardly matters. [read post]
1 May 2023, 9:00 pm
by Neil H. [read post]
1 May 2023, 6:20 am
” This solution may work legally, but as a practical matter it’s a problem. [read post]
1 May 2023, 3:23 am
H/T Doug Berman [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm
My columns have treated the controversy as an intellectual battle—a matter of great political consequence, to be sure, but nonetheless a bit bloodless—whereas in fact the stakes in this situation are anything but abstractions or merely a matter of lively debate. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 8:19 am
by Neil H. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 1:45 pm
The rule at 12 C.F.R. 121.103(h) will now clearly state: “a joint venture may be issued an order under a previously awarded contract beyond the two-year period. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 1:45 pm
The rule at 12 C.F.R. 121.103(h) will now clearly state: “a joint venture may be issued an order under a previously awarded contract beyond the two-year period. [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 11:27 am
by Neil H. [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 6:30 am
Lief H. [read post]
