Search for: "MAY v. US " Results 321 - 340 of 119,965
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2022, 6:26 am by James Romoser
To suggest a piece for us to consider, email us at roundup@scotusblog.com. [read post]
24 May 2022, 7:26 am by James Romoser
To suggest a piece for us to consider, email us at roundup@scotusblog.com. [read post]
3 May 2022, 5:38 am by James Romoser
To suggest a piece for us to consider, email us at roundup@scotusblog.com. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 12:26 am
6/24/11 Update:  Here's my blog post providing an early analysis of the Court's decision, entitled US Supreme Court's Bombshell Opinion in Stern v. [read post]
19 May 2022, 2:00 pm by Janet Stewart Scalley
To be sure, however, a parent’s occasional, but excessive alcohol use may be seen as just as concerning as a parent’s one time cocaine use. [read post]
30 Jan 2004, 6:30 am
In Friday's US law and business press, the National Law Journal reports on how Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia's dissent in Lawrence v. [read post]
The Texas legislature on Tuesday passed a bill that will criminalize performing an abortion in Texas if the US Supreme Court overturns Roe v. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 8:00 am by Paul Caron
Phyllis Taite (Oklahoma City) presents Welfare v Wealthfare: The Illusion of Equity in Tax Policy at Georgetown today as part of its Tax Law and Public Finance Workshop hosted by Emily Satterthwaite and Dayanand Manoli: Tax laws and policies may be perceived as race-neutral because race data is not used... [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 7:03 am by Kate Fort
Given the decision of NCFA to appeal the recent win in the Eastern District of Virginia to the Fourth Circuit this may be useful (if frustrating) reading. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 11:27 am by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
Hana Bank is whether a judge or jury should determine if the use of an older mark may be tacked to a new one. [read post]
4 May 2010, 11:01 am
And since the district court's ruling really did prevent Stever from arguing that it was someone else, that seems like reversible error to me.Admittedly, I think that there may be some "strategery" going on here, and have a weak sense (though may be totally making this up) that the defense requested the discovery at issue not only because it might use it at trial, but also because producing it would be a big hassle for the government and thus incline them to… [read post]