Search for: "MINING v. PRICE"
Results 321 - 340
of 564
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 May 2013, 9:53 am
A week ago the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued its opinion in a snowplow patent case, Douglas Dynamics, LLC v. [read post]
9 May 2013, 2:54 pm
However, the European Commission's preliminary assessment is that the license agreement underlying that rate-setting case came into being under anticompetitive circumstances, calling into question whether there even is an enforceable agreement in place.Alternatively to a process in Germany, Google "suggest[ed] the [arbitration] panel [in the United States] employ a 'baseball arbitration' procedure to resolve any areas in which the parties are unable to reach agreement" (emphasis mine). [read post]
13 Apr 2013, 10:51 am
The only reason to oppose this bill is as a back-door means of criminalizing youthful gay relations, since after Lawrence v. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 3:56 pm
The most recent detailed discussion of this from a federal court is in United States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 9:47 am
Supreme Court continued its recent trend of imposing more stringent standards for class certification in Comcast Corporation v. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 1:51 pm
Comcast v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 1:04 pm
Itar-Tass Russian News Agency v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 8:55 am
Before yesterday’s ruling in the Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 10:58 pm
By Daniel RichardsonShattuck v. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 6:00 am
A trial date for Grant Street Group v. [read post]
17 Feb 2013, 9:03 pm
Arguing in McBurney v. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 4:50 pm
In contrast to SMARA, the Ninth Circuit’s ruling in CBD v. [read post]
9 Feb 2013, 12:54 pm
In 2009, unable to settle on a price with the landowner, the government took the property through eminent domain. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 12:59 pm
For more information, visit our Securities Mining Law blog at SecuritiesMiningLaw.com [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 6:50 am
Maxzone (Cartel Sentencing) In an important Federal Court decision issued in September, 2012 in the ongoing global auto parts price-fixing investigation (R. v. [read post]
25 Dec 2012, 8:08 am
Rajiv then came up with a penetrating analysis of an IPAB decision (Bayer v. [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 7:52 pm
Jindal Global University; Formerly Professor and Dean, Faculty of Law, University of Delhi, India Enforcing Socio-Economic Rights through Public Interest Litigation: An Overview of the Indian Experience 3) Dr Leïla Choukroune, Senior Lecturer in International Economic Law, Faculty of Law, Maastricht University, The Netherlands The Paradox of Justiciability: Labour PIL in China and India Questions/Comments 6:30pm-8:30pm – Welcome Dinner hosted by the City University Law School (by… [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 8:43 am
The result is invariably that the public have to pay higher prices than if the monopoly did not exist. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 9:00 am
The Court of Chancery considered the issues of fair dealing and fair price in a comprehensive and complete manner. [read post]
8 Oct 2012, 1:43 pm
A colleague of mine, whose views on this topic differ, suggested in a debate recently that United States v. [read post]
