Search for: "MOON v. THE STATE"
Results 321 - 340
of 575
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Aug 2014, 9:04 am
While the state argued in the district court that "it is common knowledge that people that do not eat or drink for a day are still able to produce urine," the state does not advance that argument on appeal.Since Holland has shown that the hard-and-fast three-hour window substantially burdens his religious practices, to win the case, the state has to show that its policy is "reasonably related to legitimate penological interests," a lenient standard… [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 6:05 am
President Vladimir V. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 12:35 pm
That is like saying a ride on horseback is materially indistinguishable from a flight to the moon. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 12:35 pm
That is like saying a ride on horseback is materially indistinguishable from a flight to the moon. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 6:43 am
Expectation of privacy underlies decisions in such cases as United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2014, 5:08 am
“The United States asserts that a search of all data stored on a cell phone is ‘materially indistinguishable’ from searches of [a wallet or purse] … That is like saying a ride on horseback is materially indistinguishable from a flight to the moon. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 3:07 pm
Citing Justice Sotomayor’s concurrence in United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 7:37 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 6:58 am
California and United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 1:26 am
Now, you may be forgiven for thinking that this is a basic question which should have been resolved many moons ago. [read post]
29 May 2014, 4:24 am
The Supreme Court’s 5-4 opinion in Hall v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 12:37 pm
The Court saw that case – United States v. [read post]
20 May 2014, 7:09 am
They focus on the methodology that the Court has formulated to assess if state interference complies with constitutional provisions to determine if state intervention into property interests has been legitimate. [read post]
15 May 2014, 4:19 am
In Torres-Ramos v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 9:00 am
Clement insists that the balancing test in Mathews v. [read post]
6 May 2014, 8:42 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Monroe Energy, LLC v. [read post]
1 May 2014, 9:01 pm
Anthony List v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 7:30 am
Interestingly, Much of the argument concerned a 2009 ruling, Wyeth v. [read post]
22 Mar 2014, 6:20 pm
Blake v. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 4:30 am
State Farm.1 On the other hand, we had the policyholder-friendly view of the Fifth District Court of Appeal – State Farm v. [read post]