Search for: "MORRISON v. MORRISON"
Results 321 - 340
of 2,479
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2020, 3:04 am
Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison replied, ‘[w]e deport non-citizens who have committed crimes in Australia against our community’. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 5:00 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 5:00 am
In Arizona v. [read post]
5 Apr 2020, 10:32 pm
Last week the Munich I Regional Court's press office confirmed to me that the Nokia v. [read post]
5 Apr 2020, 4:47 pm
On 1 April 2020 the Supreme Court handed down the judgment in the case of WM Morrison Supermarkets plc v Various Claimants([2020] UKSC 12), where it reversed the decision of the Court of Appeal and found that Morrisons was not vicariously liable for a rogue employee who posted payroll data of 100,000 other employees on a file-sharing website. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 10:36 am
On 1 April 2020, the UK Supreme Court handed down its ruling in WM Morrison Supermarkets plc v Various Claimants [2020] UKSC 12. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 8:05 am
The first case is WM Morrison Supermarkets plc v Various Claimants. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 3:48 am
The key issue before the Supreme Court was whether the “close connection” test developed in previous case law was satisfied, and therefore whether vicarious liability could be imposed on Morrisons. [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 4:19 pm
In particular, the Court of Appeal appeared to have taken Lord Toulson’s comment in the case of Mohamud v WM Morrisons Supermarkets plc [2016] UKSC 11 that “motive is irrelevant” out of context. [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 9:02 am
The key issue before the Supreme Court was whether the “close connection” test developed in previous case law was satisfied, and therefore whether vicarious liability could be imposed on Morrisons. [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 2:30 am
On appeal from: [2018] EWCA Civ 1670 In this appeal, the Supreme Court is asked to decide whether Barclays Bank is vicariously liable for sexual assaults allegedly committed between 1968 and about 1984 by the late Dr Gordon Bates. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm
In U.S. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 3:22 pm
Here is the introduction from Lane v. [read post]
29 Mar 2020, 4:49 pm
Newspapers Journalism and Regulation The Press Gazette had a piece “Marketers urged to ‘back don’t block British journalism’ as Covid-19 hits online advertising” IPSO IPSO has published a number of rulings and resolutions statements since our last Round Up: 08645-19 A Man v The Sunday Times, 1 Accuracy (2019), 2 Privacy (2019), 6 Children (2019), no breach- after investigation 07416-19 Englefield Estate v readingchronicle.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2019),… [read post]
29 Mar 2020, 11:08 am
On March 29, 1875, in the case of Minor v. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 10:56 am
The Supreme Court recently denied certiorari in a Ninth Circuit case that declined to apply the relevant Second Circuit precedent and the latest petition for certiorari on this issue relies heavily on another Ninth Circuit case that also declined to follow the Second Circuit (Atlantic Trading USA, LLC v. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 2:30 am
WM Morrisons Supermarkets plc v Various Claimants, heard 6-7 November 2019. [read post]
22 Mar 2020, 5:12 pm
Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings in media law cases are outstanding: Aven v Orbis Business Intelligence, heard 16 to 19 March 2020 (Warby J) Hijazi v Yaxley-Lennon, heard 12 March 2020 (Nicklin J) ZXC v Bloomberg, heard 3 and 4 March 2020 (Underhill, Bean and Simon LJJ) Sube v News Group Newspapers, heard 4 to 7 February 2020 (Warby J) W M Morrison Supermarkets plc v V [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 6:26 am
Overview In 2019, the Supreme Court issued an important securities law decision in Lorenzo v. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 3:05 am
WM Morrisons Supermarkets plc v Various Claimants, heard 6-7 November 2019. [read post]
