Search for: "Major v. Social Security Administration"
Results 321 - 340
of 1,269
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2017, 4:55 am
April Doss examined the Trump administration’s proposals to examine the social media accounts of visitors to the United States. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 9:07 am
The first act of discrimination allegedly occurred when a person in the human resources office refused to accept the court order changing his name, insisting that he produce a name change form from the Social Security Administration. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 5:00 pm
Righting for the Supreme Court Majority, Justice Kennedy explained that ERISA expressly pre-empts “any and all State laws insofar as they may now or hereafter relate to any employee benefit plan. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm
Remember that day’s Espinoza v. [read post]
5 Jan 2019, 5:22 am
Shane Harris, Susan Hennessey, Benjamin Wittes, and Tamara Cofman Wittes discussed how the new Congress and a new Cabinet might confront major national security challenges in 2019 on this week’s Rational Security: The “New Year New You” Edition: On Jan. 1, 2019, Defense Secretary James Mattis departed the Pentagon and was replaced on an acting basis by his deputy, Patrick Shanahan. [read post]
5 May 2018, 7:43 am
Sophia Brill returned to last Wednesday’s Supreme Court oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
21 Mar 2021, 2:28 pm
Finally, in the Court’s first case on the Affordable Care Act (NFIB v. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 10:00 am
The first one—Naji v. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 3:08 pm
The employer declined, however, to provide “pedigree” information of employees who had similarly been required to undergo a physical evaluation—including their names, Social Security numbers, addresses, and telephone numbers. [read post]
14 Mar 2018, 12:46 am
In both years, the majority of the SEC’s standalone actions concerned issuer reporting/accounting and auditing, securities offerings, and investment advisory issues. [read post]
7 Jul 2019, 4:23 pm
Opinion polls show a very large majority of the population support this position (see our post here). [read post]
17 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Brandeis agreed with Holmes that courts should rarely invalidate social and economic legislation under the Fourteenth Amendment, but for very different reasons. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
I was lead counsel in Rasul v. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 9:25 am
Subsequently, the Chinese constitution experienced three major revisions, in 1975, 1978, and 1982. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 7:00 am
Benjamin EidelsonThis post offers preliminary analysis of DHS v. [read post]
16 Aug 2021, 8:05 am
Blackbaud “provides data collection and maintenance software solutions for administration, fundraising, marketing, and analytics to social good entities such as non-profit organizations, foundations, educational institutions, faith communities, and healthcare organizations. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 11:24 am
The Supreme Court’s recent King v. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 11:56 am
The Berry case involved a conviction for social security benefits fraud; on the issue of Berry’s knowledge of the law, the trial court admitted into evidence benefits-application records of the Social Security Administration which purported to show that an agency employee had in an interview with Berry reviewed his legal obligations regarding the receipt and disbursement of benefits payments, although no form was signed by Berry himself. [read post]
31 May 2019, 6:00 am
Mainstream reactions to the case, even on the left, did not, and do not, sufficiently spotlight that U-turn, nor its implication – that no major social or economic reforms enacted by a future Democratic Congress, nor, indeed, major reforms upheld decades ago, will be safe from Supreme Court majorities obeisant to that agenda.Roberts has not signed on to that volte face, at least not overtly or reliably. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 11:42 am
Today, the Biden administration is faced with a choice. [read post]
