Search for: "Majors v. Good" Results 321 - 340 of 17,052
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2024, 2:18 pm
  The text chart is introduced this way:Pix credit here巩固拓展主题教育成果,这份导图学习收藏 学习大国 2024-02-05 04:25 北京… [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 12:02 pm by Guest Author
” In this case, a bank’s board of directors adopted annual resolutions excluding the Chairman of the Board from participation in major policymaking functions of the bank. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 6:05 am by Katherine Yon Ebright
Invasion or Predatory Incursion Because the Alien Enemies Act has only been used in major conflicts, where Congress declared war, there is no case law interpreting the meaning of “invasion” or “predatory incursion” as those terms appear in the statute. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
“Far from seeking to devalue marriage,” Justice Anthony Kennedy responded for the majority in Obergefell v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 4:37 am by Peter Mahler
In the latter half of the 19th century, a majority rule evolved to soften the rigid voidability rule where the transaction was approved by a disinterested majority of the directors, provided the transaction “was fair, open, and free from fraud. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 3:37 am by SHG
And don’t get me started on the Reasonably Scared Cop Rule of Graham v. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 1:10 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
There probably aren’t other major complications than fair use for © screening, though they can also miss licensed uses; but it’s much harder for TM to determine infringement. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:43 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Citing both Dogan/Lemley and Dinwoodie/Janis is a good example: those articles don’t say the same thing. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 12:34 pm by John Elwood
The former Tweeter Laureate of Texas from the good old days of Twitter, Judge Don Willett, questioned whether the majority’s “exotic” negligent-protest theory could be squared with Louisiana state law’s general rule against tort liability for the criminal acts of others, suggesting that the duty question should have been certified to the Louisiana Supreme Court. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 9:25 am by Holly
February 23, 2024 |  By: Thomas Dunlap   The Supreme Court’s decision to grant certiorari in Wendy Smith et al. v. [read post]