Search for: "Marion v. State" Results 321 - 340 of 801
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Oct 2011, 12:57 pm by Edward A. Fallone
Marion County Election Board The key United States Supreme Court case analyzing the constitutionality of state voter ID laws is the 2008 case of Crawford v. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 3:21 am by Russ Bensing
David Kelley and Mark Kinkaid of Marion, Ohio, are going to find out. [read post]
30 Jul 2011, 3:24 pm by Eilionoir Flynn
Marion’s case in Australia and the Ashley X case in the US) the parents of the women did not authorise, or attempt to authorise the sterilisation. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 3:00 am
Claim 3, stated to have independent validity, was attacked on grounds of obviousness – it being alleged to lack inventive step over three pieces of prior art (Qin, Lassen and ‘746) and the common general knowledge. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 8:40 am by Kiera Flynn
This week a Michigan state court relied on this Term’s decision in Wal-Mart v. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 11:08 am by Medicare Set Aside Services
The court felt that this was not a federal question and instead an action to apportion proceeds of a settlement pursuant to state law and therefore remanded the case back to the Circuit Court of Marion County. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 11:43 am by Steve Hall
The lawsuit filed in state district court in Travis County, Bhuiyan v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:23 am by rbm3
Academic freedom -- United States ACADEMIC FREEDOM AND THE LAW: A COMPARATIVE STUDY / ERIC BARENDT Oxford; Portland, Or. : Hart Pub., 2010 K3755 .B37 2010 See Catalog Affirmative action programs -- Law and legislation -- United States AFFIRMATIVE ACTION IN ANTIDISCRIMINATION LAW AND POLICY / WILLIAM M. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 11:49 am by rbm3
Academic freedom -- United States ACADEMIC FREEDOM AND THE LAW: A COMPARATIVE STUDY / ERIC BARENDT Oxford; Portland, Or. : Hart Pub., 2010 K3755 .B37 2010 See Catalog Affirmative action programs -- Law and legislation -- United States AFFIRMATIVE ACTION IN ANTIDISCRIMINATION LAW AND POLICY / WILLIAM M. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 1:44 pm
Sighted this morning, breaking the surface just off the Strand, the judgment of Mr Justice Arnold in MedImmune v Novartis [2011] EWHC 1669 (Pat) certainly fits the legend.In characteristic style, the judgment is as comprehensive as one would wish. [read post]