Search for: "Mark Strong"
Results 321 - 340
of 10,757
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2019, 1:34 am
Indeed, the strong notoriety of Adidas and its products as well as its extensive portfolio of worldwide intellectual property rights (trademarks, designs and models) will continue to be effective weapons in the future. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 1:34 am
Indeed, the strong notoriety of Adidas and its products as well as its extensive portfolio of worldwide intellectual property rights (trademarks, designs and models) will continue to be effective weapons in the future. [read post]
5 Sep 2006, 5:18 am
" As to Opposer's logo mark, the word DARJEELING is the dominant element and neither the design portion, nor the addition of NOUVEAU to DARJEELING in Applicant's mark, "affects the commercial impression created by the strong and distinctive word DARJEELING. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 4:33 am
It found the marks, registered on the Principal Register without a Section 2(f) claim, to be conceptually strong, noting that there was no indication that they have a recognized meaning in the industry. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 6:34 am
In light of extensive advertising and promotional efforts and media references, the Board found the mark to be commercially strong. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 5:31 pm
In addition, the mere fact that the mark on the bottles was false and misrepresentative was insufficient to show the Petitioner's possessed intent to deceive, the relationship between factual falsity and state of mind not being strong enough. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 4:26 am
" "Applicant’s adoption of a color, font, and stylization with virtually identical elements to those used by Opposer for its PEPSI-COLA script mark is 'eyebrow raising,' ... and is strong evidence of Applicant’s intent to copy and create an association with Opposer’s mark. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 7:54 am
Instead, the TTAB should have considered whether Forney’s mark makes such a strong impression on consumers that they will assume the trade dress is associated with a particular source, as outlined in Seabrook Foods, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 3:30 am
The post <strong>2023 Labor Trend – the Shift from the Great Resignation to Quiet Quitting</strong> appeared first on HR Daily Advisor. [read post]
21 Aug 2011, 8:39 pm
Courts give strong marks more protection that weak marks. [read post]
16 May 2012, 5:43 pm
Just over a month after Facebook’s widely-reported acquisition of Instagram for one billion dollars, there are strong signals that the purchase may be delayed by the FTC. [read post]
1 Oct 2022, 11:05 am
One thing is clear, though: the attack marks a dangerous escalation in the West’s proxy war with Russia. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 6:52 am
[Apparently, in the Board's view that presumption of validity is not so strong after all]. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 4:11 am
" The Board found Monster's mark to be conceptually strong and famous for energy drinks, but there was no evidence that its mark is famous, or even commercially strong, for clothing. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 9:08 am
[Defendant] also continually advanced remarkable contentions throughout this litigation, such as the argument that the [asserted] mark was worth 'zero' despite the Court's prior holding that that [defendant's] competing use of the [asserted] mark created a likelihood of confusion and that the mark was commercially strong. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 3:05 am
This is because, from a trade mark attorney's point of view, a strong trade mark is one that it is invented or only alludes to the characteristics of the goods, whereas from a marketing point of view the most attractive names are often descriptive and in some cases, even generic names. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 11:39 am
It is important for superstar celebrities, like Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce and especially the two of them together, to recognize the distinctiveness of their names as marks and likenesses and to protect the strong power of these identities to identify goods and services, just like most businesses do, by federally registering these names and likenesses as marks. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 3:27 am
: The Board found opposer's marks to be inherently strong, noting that they are registered on the Principal Register without a 2(f) claim. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 4:32 am
That figure exceeds survey results that courts have deemed to be strong evidence of confusion. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 11:46 pm
The Board did, however, find that the mark to be "strong and distinctive. [read post]
