Search for: "Mark v. Mark"
Results 321 - 340
of 34,421
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2024, 3:59 am
Eureka Chemical Company v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 11:00 pm
WAITED TOO LONG TO GET SOCIAL MEDIA INFOSome six months after a personal injury case was marked ready for trial -- i.e., after a “note of issue” was filed -- the plaintiff was served with a “notice to admit,” wherein the defendant was asking the plaintiff to “to admit or deny whether the appended photos were a ‘fair and/or correct representation’ of screen shots” taken from various social media accounts.After the plaintiff’s request for… [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
As we gather to mark ten years of dialogue, I think it’s important to both summarize what we’ve learned during this period and see how we can leverage those lessons to effect better compliance in the future. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 6:47 pm
Richmond Newspapers v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 9:24 am
Hunt (Matthew) v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 8:16 am
Court of Federal Claims’ 2023 determination in Myriddian, LLC v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 3:57 am
Nemiroff Intellectual Property Establishment v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 9:36 am
Background of Estrada v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 9:07 am
Corp. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 8:59 am
King v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 5:55 am
Israel’s military campaign against Hamas has just now passed the six-month mark. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 4:05 am
TBL Licensing v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 3:38 am
Conversely, the Artpusher case resulted in a ruling against the gallery, emphasizing that trademark law does not harbor a parody exception akin to that in copyright law, marking a clear boundary for artists and commercial entities alike regarding the use of trademarks in art, especially for commercial purposes.In the Jack Daniel's v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 3:28 am
Retro-KatsThere are still places available for the fifth annual Retromark conference, which returns for another afternoon of in-person trade mark law and practice hosted by Darren Meale of Simmons & Simmons and the IPKat on Tuesday 7 May. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 1:14 am
In the third (and final) of our blogs reporting on the UK Court of Appeal decision in Lidl v Tesco, we examine the findings in relation to non-use revocation. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 12:00 am
Part V concludes. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 8:55 pm
Board of Education, Grutter v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 1:10 pm
S., at 315 (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 12:32 pm
In Futch v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 12:32 pm
In Futch v. [read post]
