Search for: "Mark v. Wish"
Results 321 - 340
of 2,165
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2024, 11:52 am
In a prior post, I have analyzed the justices’ treatment of the questions presented in the petition in Smith v. [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 9:27 pm
If the writers wish their comments to be given serious consideration, they are invited to amend their posts so as to state who they are. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 5:27 am
KG v Stokke A/S, Stokke Nederland BV, Peter Opsvik and Peter Opsvik A/S, a decision where the CJEU addressed the trade mark absolute grounds of “substantial value” and “shape which results from the nature of the goods themselves”. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 5:45 am
SC07-2138 MARK DEAN SCHWAB, Appellant, v. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 5:45 am
SC07-2138 MARK DEAN SCHWAB, Appellant, v. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 7:30 pm
Wilner wishes to distinguish Kiyemba. [read post]
23 Feb 2020, 5:57 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Cruzan v. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 12:30 pm
"He also commented that in Interflora 1 (Interflora Inc v Marks and Spencer plc [2012] EWCA Civ 1501 [noted by the IPKat here] Lewison L.J. had stated that different considerations from the general position on surveys apply where the issue is whether a registered mark has acquired distinctiveness. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 4:12 am
Hearst Holdings Inc & Another v A.V.E.L.A. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 8:37 am
Supreme Court ruled in Epic Systems Corp. v. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 1:16 am
Does Mr Justice Arnold's decision in Teva v MSD show just how large a role patent law has come to play in assessing SPC validity? [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 2:55 am
Parker comes from Lyle Denniston for this blog and Mark Walsh for Education Week. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 3:12 am
"Kit Kat" finger shape marks: this time in Singapore The Singapore Court of Appeal in Societe Des Produits Nestlé SA and anor v Petra Foods Limited and anor [2016] SGCA 64 recently affirmed a previous High Court decision that Nestlé’s two-finger and four-finger shape marks (the “Shape Marks”) are not registrable. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 9:26 am
"Kit Kat" finger shape marks: this time in Singapore The Singapore Court of Appeal in Societe Des Produits Nestlé SA and anor v Petra Foods Limited and anor [2016] SGCA 64 recently affirmed a previous High Court decision that Nestlé’s two-finger and four-finger shape marks (the “Shape Marks”) are not registrable. [read post]
1 Apr 2023, 6:35 am
Do You Wish to Know? [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 10:28 am
Cites Feltner v. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 7:09 am
Bar Assn. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 3:02 pm
See Sheetz of Delaware, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 3:02 pm
See Sheetz of Delaware, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 9:05 pm
I wish them good luck with that. [read post]
