Search for: "Markes v. United States" Results 321 - 340 of 10,262
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Oct 2016, 5:25 pm by Ruthann Robson
Scott, United States District Judge Mark Walker extended the voter registration until Wednesday, October 12, at 5:00pm and also scheduled... [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 2:46 am by Family Law
From the New Yorker: Today, the official archive of gay marriage is still in its infancy: in the United States, June marked the fifth anniversary of the Supreme Court’s ruling in Obergefell v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 11:28 am by Wells C. Bennett
Yesterday, Judge John Bates of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia granted the government’s motion for summary judgment in the case of Kadi v. [read post]
12 Jul 2014, 12:27 pm
 I was perfectly content with my life until Jeremy suggested that I blog about the United States Patent and Trademark Office (TTAB) Harry Winston v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 3:36 am
The Baze Decision On April 16, 2008, the United States Supreme Court issuedits plurality opinion in Baze v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 7:50 am by The Docket Navigator
This notice is not expedient enough to provide the United States with sufficient time to protect its interests, and is not directed to the Department of Justice -- the agency responsible for representing the United States’ interests in a false marking suit. . . . [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 1:06 pm by Public Employment Law Press
The United States Supreme Court held that the State’s extraction of agency fees from nonconsenting public-sector employees violated the First Amendment, overruling its earlier decision in Abood v Detroit Board of Education, 431 U. [read post]
Case date: 14 August 2023 Case number: No. 22-1839 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
1 May 2009, 11:36 am by Bill Heinze
Furthermore, while Section 44 was “generally intended” to implement elements of the Paris Convention, In re Rath, 402 F.3d at 1207, 74 USPQ2d at 1177, it does not, through subsections 44(b) or (h) or otherwise, provide the user of an assertedly famous foreign trademark with an independent basis for cancellation in a Board proceeding, absent use of the mark in the United States. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 6:40 am
To prove such an intention, a party must show that "its activities are those that a reasonable businessman with a bona fide intent to use the mark in United States would have undertaken. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 1:54 pm by Edward A. Fallone
Today marks the beginning of the United States Supreme Court’s 2015-2016 Term, and coincidentally it also marked my participation in an annual event at the Marquette University Law School entitled “Supreme Court Roundup. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 3:06 am
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia reversed the TTAB's ruling in Bayer Consumer Care AG v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 1:21 pm by DMLP Staff
Baringer; James R BullmanSource of Law: United StatesLouisianaVerdict or Settlement Amount: N/ALegal Claims: Trademark InfringementCourt Name: United States District Court, Middle District of LouisianaLegal Counsel: Stephen G. [read post]