Search for: "Marks v. Cross"
Results 321 - 340
of 2,842
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2015, 8:02 am
Case citation: Multi Time Machine, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 7:43 am
To support that, SLC cited the once high-profile J’adore Dior trade mark case in China (IPKat post here) in which the three-dimensional mark at issue, also a perfume bottle, was not granted trade mark registration at that time. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 12:06 pm
It may well be only the "sheet music" that's protected by the relevant statute, but when Jimmy Page gets cross-examined, the jury should hear the song. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 1:28 am
Charmaine V. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 12:53 am
Prince Harry faced two days of cross-examination this week as Fancourt J continued to hear the trial in the case of Various Claimants v MGN. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 9:39 am
See FTC v. 1-800 Contacts. * Cedar Valley Exteriors, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 10:26 am
Ginsburg’s dissent explains that a starkly religious message like that symbolized by the Bladensburg cross is not diminished because it dates to World War I, when crosses were common grave markers for U.S. soldiers overseas, noting that the graves of Jewish soldiers were marked with the Star of David. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 1:12 pm
Sorensen v. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 11:35 am
The Court of Appeals decision in ITC Ltd. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 10:03 am
Buono, in which the USSCt upheld government display of a Christian cross, and Lautsi & Others v. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 1:29 am
First, the interviewees did not represent the relevant-cross section of the public. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 10:45 pm
Eveready Battery Company, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 5:17 am
Plaintiff did not submit the summary until nearly a month after the original oral argument on defendant’s cross motion (see Kopeloff v Arctic Cat, Inc., 84 AD3d 890, 890-891 [2d Dept 2011]). [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 12:29 pm
Varnum v. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 9:23 pm
The court mentioned that no fences had to be crossed to get to the back door. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 8:51 am
Yes, today's the day of Advocate General Cruz Villalón’s Opinion in Case C-235/09 DHL Express (France) SAS v Chronopost SA. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 1:11 am
It’s not so long since the Navajo v Urban Outfitters case concerning alleged trade mark infringement, dilution, unfair competition, false advertising, and violations of the Federal Indian Arts and Crafts Act, which makes it illegal to sell arts or crafts in a way that falsely suggests they were produced by Native Americans (the AmeriKat has already covered this here). [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 3:24 am
The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2009, 2:55 am
Masters v. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 3:30 am
Toro Co. v. [read post]
