Search for: "Marks v. USA"
Results 321 - 340
of 1,898
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Aug 2013, 1:17 pm
(citation and internal quotation marks omitted); Runfola, 88 F.3d at 373 (affirming Rule 11 sanctions against counsel who failed to dismiss the action after becoming aware of their inability to assert any evidence in support of their claims). [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 3:20 am
American Lebanese Syrian Associated Charities, Inc. v. [read post]
26 May 2019, 6:24 am
The International Intellectual Property Law Association still have some spaces at their conference IIPLA 4th Annual Meeting 2019 USA at Palo Alto, USA on 24 & 25 September, 2019. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 3:24 am
Garan Services Corp. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 7:47 am
The post Trademark Butter Battle: Kerrygold v. [read post]
12 May 2015, 12:25 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has determined in American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) v. [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 7:08 am
Ein völkerrechtlicher Vertrag wäre nicht erforderlich. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 4:52 am
This blog’s Lyle Denniston covered the certiorari grant in Teva Pharmaceuticals USA v. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 5:24 pm
This morning the Court heard argument in Friedrichs v. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 4:14 am
Timex Group USA, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 1:00 am
See Commerce Bancorp, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 7:32 am
The high profile and high profit marks are tenaciously protected both on an international and national stage. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 1:38 am
Last week marked More Than Just a Game V - the London edition.MTJG (as it is known by those in the know) is an international series of academic-led conferences on Games and Interactive Entertainment Law attracting an international network of researchers and legal professionals who are passionate about the most successful and fastest-growing of the Creative Industries.Anne Rose (Mishcon de Reya) attended the conference and has provided this summary of some of the more IP relevant… [read post]
28 May 2019, 4:07 am
In addition, the district court did not abuse its discretion by denying ACT’s request for a permanent injunction because ACT failed to establish that it would sustain irreparable harm (ACT 898 Products, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 4:02 am
Patron Spirits International, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 2:26 am
As a result, condition (v) was deemed satisfied.Turning to likelihood of confusion (condition (vi)), the court recalled that this requires a global appreciation, taking into account all relevant factors, and must be undertaken from the perspective of the average consumer (see Comic Enterprises Ltd v Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation [2016] EWCA Civ 41).Benefit submitted that no such likelihood of confusion would subsist because of case law (notably Nestle v… [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 5:00 am
Applicant unsuccessfully argued, based on its interpretation of the CAFC's decision in Palm Bay Imports, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 5:08 am
Pure Energy Services (USA), Inc. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 7:00 am
In Cotton Commercial USA, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 11:17 am
False Marking: The Supreme Court has denied certiorari in PubPat's False Marking case. [read post]
