Search for: "Marks v. United States Department of Justice"
Results 321 - 340
of 1,599
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Sep 2022, 10:52 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2020, 10:22 am
Chris Ford, assistant secretary of state for international security and nonproliferation at the State Department, on the future of arms control in the United States. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 8:12 am
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit tackled self-execution of 1958 Convention Article 6—curtailing jurisdiction over foreign vessels in international waters—in United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 6:05 am
Department of Justice before being allowed to implement them. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 6:52 pm
Montana Department of Revenue, 591 U. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 11:43 am
Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote for the majority. [read post]
2 Oct 2022, 10:26 pm
United States. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 7:52 am
During my time in the State Department, the case came back to the district court following the D.C. [read post]
18 Nov 2007, 9:03 pm
There is an established right under the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution which prohibits the execution of one who is insane, as set forth by the United States Supreme Court in Ford v. [read post]
18 Nov 2007, 9:03 pm
There is an established right under the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution which prohibits the execution of one who is insane, as set forth by the United States Supreme Court in Ford v. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm
One of his legal advisors put it bluntly: “We’re waiting for the United States Supreme Court—of which the President has nominated three justices—to step in and do something. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:52 am
Mesa, which “asks whether there is a remedy for a Mexican citizen killed when a Border Patrol agent in the United States opens fire on someone in Mexico,” and Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 4:00 pm
The President has delegated that power to the State Department’s Directorate of Defense Trade Controls. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 5:26 am
Circuit wrote: An administrative agency is not subject to Article III of the Constitution of the United States [and] so the petitioner would have had no need to establish its standing to participate in the proceedings before the agency. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 3:56 pm
Professor Michael McConnell points me to United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 10:09 pm
United States, 588 U. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 3:45 am
United States, a unanimous court held that a trial court can consider mandatory minimums for possessing firearms when sentencing a defendant for an underlying drug offense. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 4:00 am
Lefkowitz & Steven Menashi, Brief of Amici Curiae Former Justice Department Officials in Support of Petitioners in Zubik v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 3:06 am
Vinter and others v United Kingdom (application nos. 66069/09, 130/10 and 3896/10) – read judgment The Strasbourg Court has found three British murderers’ imprisonment for life is not inhuman or degrading and therefore not in violation of Article 3. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 12:26 pm
Department of Justice, as well as the FBI, made an official acknowledgement that almost every examiner in the FBI’s elite forensic unit provided testimony that was inherently flawed in nearly all trials wherein they offered evidence against defendants in criminal cases for more than 20 years prior to 2000. [read post]
