Search for: "Marts v. Superior Court"
Results 321 - 340
of 345
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2008, 7:00 am
Superior Court, 42 Cal. 4th 443, 457-59, 462, 464-65 (2007), instructive. [read post]
6 May 2008, 6:00 am
Superior Court, 42 Cal. 4th 443, 457-59, 462, 464-65 (2007), instructive. [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 1:37 pm
Cowett of California Superior Court in San Diego ruled that Starbucks must provide restitution, with interest, of over $100 million. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 6:00 am
GIC 858845) APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of San Diego County, William R. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 11:20 am
King Billable Hour v. [read post]
3 Feb 2008, 1:58 pm
The case went before a Los Angeles Superior Court jury consisting of 5 men (one African-American) and 7 women. [read post]
28 Jan 2008, 12:16 pm
Dukes v. [read post]
21 Jan 2008, 10:04 am
K Mart Corp., 237 F.Supp.2d 907 (N.D.Ill.,2002); Schnadig Corp. v. [read post]
26 Dec 2007, 11:40 am
" Wal-Mart Stores v. [read post]
23 Dec 2007, 7:07 am
In Huber v. [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 12:03 am
Huber v. [read post]
7 Dec 2007, 10:44 am
In Huber v. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 9:44 pm
Just over one third of executing jurisdictions - 13 states - have formal execution protocols though recent court litigation suggests a lack of knowledge of the procedures by corrections staff and unreliable implementation of procedures in many cases. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 10:00 am
Superior Court, supra, 29 Cal.4th at p. 1106.) [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 2:47 am
Supreme Court to reconsider in light of Carey v. [read post]
30 Aug 2007, 12:54 am
Superior Court Judge Robert Reed says D'Arienzo's poor attendance suggests he has compromised his client's interests. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 10:37 am
Superior Court, 920 P.2d 1347, 1354 (Cal. 1996); Brown v. [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 9:07 am
Bourbon Mini-Mart, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 6:00 am
Finally, as to the manageability prong, the Court noted that courts in other states (notably, California and my firm's own Wal-Mart case, Savaglio v. [read post]
23 May 2007, 3:00 pm
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. are now a matter of public record, thanks to the Berkeley Daily Planet and a ruling by the First District Court of Appeal, which held last month that a litigant who has not properly brought a motion to seal documents under California Rules of Court is not entitled to have publicly filed records in Court of Appeal writ proceedings sealed, even if they had been filed under seal in Superior Court. [read post]
