Search for: "Massachusetts v. EPA"
Results 321 - 340
of 720
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2011, 9:11 pm
Worse on law and policy, because it would indicate that standing for states under Massachusetts v. [read post]
28 May 2011, 6:57 pm
They also tend to ignore the fact that similar arguments were made to the Supreme Court in Massachusetts v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 2:40 pm
Before the Supreme Court ruling in Massachusetts v. [read post]
12 May 2011, 3:47 pm
Connecticut, the Supreme Court is faced with the next, inevitable step in a line of climate change litigation including, most notably, Massachusetts v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 3:57 pm
Supreme Court when the justices took up the question of whether the Clean Air Act requires the EPA to regulate GHGs in the landmark Massachusetts v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 1:30 pm
Union v. [read post]
23 Apr 2011, 6:19 am
Jonathan Adler, at the Volokh Conspiracy, thinks that Mass v. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 12:50 pm
One might have thought this issue was settled in Massachusetts v. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 6:27 pm
” The Supreme Court ultimately hears the case of Massachusetts, et al. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 11:46 am
First, it is difficult to argue that their claim is not displaced by the Clean Air Act’s authorization of extensive regulation of greenhouse gases post–Massachusetts v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 11:20 am
I suppose that is not surprising, given the Massachusetts v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 6:06 am
In an op-ed for the Christian Science Monitor, Megan Brown describes the case as “novel, and far more aggressive and disruptive than” Massachusetts v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 1:22 am
True, EPA has authority to curb carbon pollution under the Clean Air Act, as the Supreme Court recognized in Massachusetts v. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 3:39 pm
Second, I think standing here is distinguishable from Massachusetts v. [read post]
16 Apr 2011, 4:56 pm
The Supreme Court, however, ruled in 2007 in the case of Massachusetts v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 9:40 am
Overturn the Supreme Court’s 2007 decision, in Massachusetts v EPA, holding that greenhouse gases (GHGs) constitute “air pollution” within the meaning of the Clean Air Act and that EPA has the duty to regulate it if the agency finds that GHG emissions endanger health and welfare; . [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 9:46 am
With Massachusetts v. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 11:02 am
United States triggered a vast regulatory expansion in Massachusetts v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 7:50 am
Lawrence Hurley and Elana Schor of Greenwire (via the New York Times) review the practical and political implications of Massachusetts v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 4:25 pm
In its April 2007 decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]
