Search for: "Matter of Adoption of Doe"
Results 321 - 340
of 21,585
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2023, 4:00 am
This does not mean you are entitled, but it does mean you may be eligible. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 11:14 am
The DTSA does not preempt state laws, but provides trade secret owners with another, optional forum when the subject matter of the trade secret relates to interstate commerce. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 12:23 pm
The 9th Circuit, relying on the Supreme Court's decision in Reed, reversed and held that incomplete registration does not "restrict a federal court's subject matter jurisdiction. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 7:21 pm
Nor does it affect trusts. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 3:29 am
Does Politico suddenly have the inside track at the SEC? [read post]
17 Sep 2017, 3:00 pm
(emphasis added) A sobering reminder of why the First Amendment matters, and an (outrageous) example of the dangers of sealing. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 4:37 pm
Same thing for adult adoptions: no matter how legally valid the adoption might be, settlor intent remains the outcome-determinitive question for trust-administration purposes. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 8:15 pm
C-148/02), pure choice of law in family matters (and MAPs) does not seem the rule yet, if only because the European private international law regulations in family matters have not provided for such a complete freedom. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 10:03 am
“When someone is accused of a crime, due process does not permit the state to put forth evidence of a prior conviction as sufficient proof to convict him or her of the new charge,” she said. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 1:43 am
by adopting a double-track taxation for users and tailoring a brand-new role for platforms. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 1:24 pm
The Final Rule does not address other matters or potential changes to the de minimis exception. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 2:10 pm
” The FTC concluded, “If FERC adopted the 2010 guidelines’ updated concentration thresholds but did not also revise its approach to place more emphasis on competitive effects––including examination of such effects even when the merger does not exceed the concentration screen––then it could potentially approve mergers that pose serious threats to competition, with significant harmful effects on consumers. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 6:23 am
The post DOES YOUR JURISDICTION RECOGNIZE THE CARDINAL CHANGE DOCTRINE? [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 1:16 pm
Does Connecticut’s arbitration code determine the process of appraisal in Connecticut? [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 6:06 am
How Rule of Law Backsliding Began Poland’s rule of law crises started in 2015 when PiS came to power and began the takeover of the Constitutional Tribunal, adopting many legislative amendments that removed structural guarantees for the independence and impartiality of the country’s judicial and prosecutorial systems. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 7:54 am
The adopting release extends the transition guidance provided in the proposing release by confirming that even prior to the final rules becoming effective, companies are not required to file preliminary proxy statements if the only matters that otherwise would require a preliminary proxy statement are the say-on-pay and say-on-frequency votes. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 5:49 am
From In the Matter of L.D.R.S., decided last month by the Ohio Court of Appeals (Judge Matt Lynch, joined by Judges John Eklund and Robert Patton), but just noted last week in the Westlaw Bulletin: L.D.R.S. was born on August 20, 2014, to unmarried parents. [read post]
15 Apr 2021, 10:30 am
” The district court adopted the Magistrate Judge’s report and recommendation, “agree[ing] that any prejudice to plaintiffs resulting from the destruction of the notes does not warrant the requested rebuttable presumption. [read post]
15 Apr 2021, 10:30 am
” The district court adopted the Magistrate Judge’s report and recommendation, “agree[ing] that any prejudice to plaintiffs resulting from the destruction of the notes does not warrant the requested rebuttable presumption. [read post]
15 Apr 2021, 10:30 am
” The district court adopted the Magistrate Judge’s report and recommendation, “agree[ing] that any prejudice to plaintiffs resulting from the destruction of the notes does not warrant the requested rebuttable presumption. [read post]
