Search for: "Matter of Booker"
Results 321 - 340
of 556
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Oct 2010, 3:00 am
Indeed, ever since the Supreme Court decided Booker v. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 3:54 am
Since the Supreme Court made the Guidelines advisory four years ago in Booker v. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 5:07 am
Clearly, there are times when the cost of a sentence is irrelevant, but this information, unlike the pre-Booker sentencing guidelines, doesn't constrain a judge but merely informs. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 1:11 am
Honourable mentions also go to Sang Nkhwazi (Mancunium IP), whose bouncy prose might win him a Pulitzer or Man Booker Prize if only he can be persuaded to give up his day job for a career in literature, and to the Wardblawgger Gavin Ward, for his sheer enthusiasm. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 7:18 am
Panel points out that "the Supreme Court has recently clarified that Booker does not apply to such sentence-reduction proceedings," and cites Dillon. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 6:00 am
This matter was handled by Assistant Attorney General Matthew Eubank in the Attorney General's Brooklyn Regional Office and by Consumer Frauds Bureau Deputy Chief Jeffrey K. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 9:40 am
Christopher Booker explains that the EU ‘has its own vast law-making powers, its own parliament, its own currency, its own courts. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 4:29 am
You remember them, the matrix that determined sentence before the Supremes in Booker said "never mind. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 1:07 pm
Through the right kind of education, the book suggests, avoiding authoritarian teacher-pupil models and based on the actual experiences of students and on continual shared investigation, every human being, no matter how impoverished or illiterate, can develop a new awareness of self, and the right to be heard.* 9.) [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 8:55 am
In federal court, the trial lawyer is also responsible for all appellate matters. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 5:42 am
Booker, decided July 13, 2010, unfortunately unpublished. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm
What will the Supreme Court be like without its liberal leader? [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 10:27 pm
The senators should demand, and the nominees should provide, actual substantive answers on matters jurisprudential. [read post]
26 Jun 2010, 3:27 pm
No matter, prosecutors went in and always asked for a guideline sentence. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 6:28 pm
He wanted a departure from the Guidelines recommendation itself, as permitted by Booker. [read post]
27 May 2010, 8:11 pm
Bookere, No. 07-1970 (6th Cir 5/25/2010) “District court’s grant of defendant’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus in a conviction for criminal sexual misconduct is affirmed as the Michigan Court of Appeals’ exclusion of certain evidence of victim’s sexual conduct deprived defendant of his constitutional right to a meaningful opportunity to present a complete defense as articulated by the Supreme Court in Crane. [read post]
24 May 2010, 11:29 pm
Even in this post-Booker world, the Guidelines have a huge role in federal practice. [read post]
17 May 2010, 8:53 pm
Booker and Fanfan cracked a door open on a new world of possibility for federal criminal defense. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 7:36 pm
Senior Judge Booker agreed with the outcome, but separately concurred on a different legal basis. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:59 am
Supreme Court retirements inevitably produce much more coverage of process than substance. [read post]
