Search for: "Matter of Cert. of a Question of Law" Results 321 - 340 of 1,631
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2009, 8:49 am
Div. 1999) (”In issues of custody and visitation ‘[t]he question is always what is in the best interests of the children, no matter what the parties have agreed to. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 7:22 am by Marty Lederman
  In advance of those filings, the blog will be publishing a series of posts by Marty Lederman of the Georgetown University Law Center on the Article III questions the Court has asked the parties to address in the two cases. [read post]
25 Sep 2020, 12:30 pm by Andrew Hamm
Colorado 20-120Issue: Whether, when there is no dispute that a guilty plea will trigger mandatory deportation pursuant to federal law, defense counsel must advise a noncitizen-defendant that the plea will result in deportation as a matter of law, or whether it is sufficient for defense counsel to caution that the plea could make the noncitizen-defendant “deportable” or that it will “probably” result in deportation. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 11:52 am by John Elwood
Or the fact that the court granted cert without a relist in the two “travel ban” cases, Trump v. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 8:16 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Eclecticism: when you interpret 289, you have to understand that design patent law isn’t utility patent law + different modifier. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 11:07 am by Andrew Keane Woods
  Issues Before the Court In its cert petition, the Justice Department does not question whether the presumption against extraterritoriality might apply to limit the territorial reach of the SCA (see issue (1) above) but instead weights the bulk of its argument on the second question about the location of the relevant activity. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 12:54 pm by John Elwood
They’ll be discussing four cert petitions for the second time. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 6:00 am by Kevin Johnson
Cert. petition Identifying the split in the circuits on the question, Vartelas filed a pro se petition for writ of certiorari in the Supreme Court. [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 1:44 pm by Andrew Hamm
The New Jersey Supreme Court heard oral argument on the matter, but dismissed the case as improvidently granted. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 4:14 am by Edith Roberts
At The Daily Signal, Elizabeth Slattery and Amy Swearer remark Tuesday’s cert grant in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 1:00 pm by Yishai Schwartz
” Although appellate circuits have unanimously upheld such laws, in Bank Markazi, the petitioners are now trying to put that question squarely before the Court as it relates to §8772. [read post]
19 Jun 2021, 4:57 am by Mitchell Jagodinski
Bond presents another Fourth Amendment question about the use of police force. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 4:10 am by SHG
As a practical matter, that’s a pretty important question. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 7:59 am by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court address the question of “Whether state courts lack subject matter jurisdiction over covered class actions that allege only ’33 Act claims. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 7:59 am by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court address the question of “Whether state courts lack subject matter jurisdiction over covered class actions that allege only ’33 Act claims. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 9:11 pm by Florian Mueller
There was no weekly conference last Friday, so this cert petition will be discussed this week, and we'll know the decision (unless there's another relisting) on Monday morning.Samsung received unusually broadbased support for its petition, which definitely buttressed the electronics giant's claims that the issues in the case--damages (disgorgement of unapportioned infringer's profits) and claim construction (functional elements not to be considered in infringement and… [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 2:23 pm by Stephanie Figueroa
If the issues truly are a matter of law, then they need to be addressed out right. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 3:43 am by SHG
If the States had been allowed to resolve this question through legislation, they could have included accommodations for those who hold these religious beliefs. [read post]