Search for: "Matter of Dept. of Insurance's Order"
Results 321 - 340
of 434
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Apr 2009, 5:53 am
The case is not about insurance coverage, but is worth reading nonetheless. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 10:41 pm
Dept. of Industrial Relations (1989) 48 Cal. 3d 341, 769 P.2d 399, 256 Cal. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 2:19 pm
Suffolk County Dept. of Social Servs., 199 AD2d 393, 394; see Domestic Relations Law § 240 [1-b][b][5][iv][D]). [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 6:04 am
In Matter of Lamarcus E.,--- N.Y.S.2d ----, 2012 WL 1211389 (N.Y.A.D. 3 Dept.) [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 12:55 pm
Because the matters covered are complicated and the Federal and New Jersey laws frequently change, this article can only outline some of the many legal issues you should consider.The cost of a Will depends on the size and the complexity of the estate and the plans of the person who makes the Will.A properly drawn Simple Will without Trust costs approximately $300.00 to $600.00. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 2:06 pm
Based on where the caller lives, the hotline routes the caller to a legal aid agency in his or her area where attorneys can help with a variety of legal concerns from lost documents to insurance questions, renters’ concerns, applying for federal disaster assistance, and other matters. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 2:06 pm
Based on where the caller lives, the hotline routes the caller to a legal aid agency in his or her area where attorneys can help with a variety of legal concerns from lost documents to insurance questions, renters’ concerns, applying for federal disaster assistance, and other matters. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 9:01 am
Dept. of Labor, Wage and Hour Division Fact Sheet #16. [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 8:45 am
" In the Matter of G.R., Bernard Leonelli and Mary Leonelli v. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 3:22 pm
A little history is in order at this point. [read post]
19 Jun 2006, 8:07 pm
The attorney in Matter of Aranda (First Dept decision here)has made a career of taking on the hardest litigation, on behalf of a truly legally underserved community in Washington Heights in upper NYC. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 2:11 am
., 2013 NY Slip Op 01634 (4th Dept Mar. 15, 2013). [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 7:19 pm
" The rule goes on to state that, if the pretrial conference is set up without any court order regarding the attendance of an insurance representative with settlement authority, such a person is still required by the terms of the rule to attend the conference in person "or be promptly available by phone. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 11:13 am
Child Support Cap Raised from $130,000 to $136,000 The "combined parental income amount" to be utilized in calculating child support orders has increased from $130,000 to $136,000 effective January 31, 2012. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 8:43 am
Defendant appealed from the July 2011 order. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 3:20 am
Last week, in Matter of Pokoik v 575 Realties, Inc., 2016 NY Slip Op 06648 [1st Dept Oct. 11, 2016], in a decision of apparent first impression, the First Department again reversed a lower court ruling denying inspection rights and held that the petitioner was entitled under the common law to inspect records of the corporation’s wholly-owned subsidiary. [read post]
13 Feb 2016, 10:13 am
Mills (1st Dept. 2016), the appellate court agreed with the defense and held that the pain and suffering award was excessive and ordered a huge reduction to $3,300,000 ($600,000 past, $2,700,000 future). [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 3:22 pm
California Dept. of Forestry & Fire Protection (2008) 43 Cal.4th 936, 944.) [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 9:55 am
I further believe that to affirm the grant of summary judgment to P&L on Brown's complaint would result in a miscarriage of justice under the circumstances presented.In Indiana Dept. of Environmental Management v. [read post]
11 May 2009, 3:47 am
Dept. of Job & Family Serv., which holds that in the requirement that “the grounds of the party’s appeal” has to be set forth means that parties must identify specific legal or factual errors in their notice of appeal; a simple statement that the order appealed from “is contrary to law and not supported by reliable, probative, or substantial evidence” doesn’t cut it. [read post]
