Search for: "Matter of Garcia"
Results 321 - 340
of 1,158
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Dec 2009, 2:18 pm
The Reeves Law Group is not acting as legal counsel for any party in the matters discussed in this posting. [read post]
26 Apr 2014, 11:07 am
In a case with many similarities to the Florida same sex divorce matter being deliberated here in Tampa, a district judge in Texas has ruled that, despite that state’s same sex marriage ban, two women should be permitted to divorce. [read post]
27 Sep 2012, 9:25 pm
Ray Garcia, Esq. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 11:40 am
" But the other restriction was "another matter," wrote Benham. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 3:04 pm
See Garcia, 2005 NMSC 17, P 29; Gomez, 1997 NMSC 6, PP 35, 39, 44. [read post]
27 Jul 2007, 5:56 am
Garcia v. [read post]
5 Oct 2019, 1:01 pm
Garcia on March 28, 2019, and then Kansas v. [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 10:48 am
Cesar Garcia,14 447 F.3d 1327, 1335 (11th Cir. 2006))). [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 5:01 am
In Garcia v. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 4:11 pm
”, this being a piece by Robert Carolina and Kenny Paterson on a difficult and sensitive issue faced by a judge -- in this case Mr Justice Birss in Volkswagen v Garcia -- on an application for interim injunctive relief: put simply, does the public interest in suppressing information about an insecure and allegedly secret algorithm that can lead to criminals stealing cars override the freedom of academics to disseminate their research results and the public’s right to know… [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 4:00 am
However, ruled the Appellate Division, as Petitioner's initial petition did not seek such determinations in his initial petition and only sought a determination involving the first set of charges brought against him by Organization, the Supreme Court's determination concerning that matter was fully disposed of by the court.The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2019/2019_04101.htm [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 3:57 pm
Ana Gloria Garcia Gutierrez who was photographed riding a Manatee last month was arrested on a State Attorney’s Office-issued warrant for Violation of the Florida Manatee Sanctuary Act. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 6:01 pm
” said Max Garcia of Daly City. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 9:32 am
Murphy, In Memoriam Thomas Buergenthal (1934–2023) International DecisionsJavier Garcia Olmedo, Zaza Okuashvili v. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 5:51 am
With respect to the annulment of Plainview's certificate of incorporation, authorized pursuant to § 1503(f) of the Business Corporation Law and § 230(a)(5) of the Public Health Law, and those of three other such medical service corporations purportedly owned by Rafael Garcia but otherwise unrelated to this matter, the order state[d] that the Hearing Committee believes that annulment goes beyond revocation in that the corporations will be treated as if… [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 7:50 am
Joaquin “El Chapo” Guzman Loera and Ismael “El Mayo” Zambada Garcia face murder and conspiracy charges connected with drug trafficking, money laundering and organized crime. [read post]
10 Mar 2012, 11:50 am
"It doesn't matter whether they are in the middle of pursuing a suspect. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:08 pm
" In light of the foregoing, and given that no contrary medical opinions were presented, the Board's factual determination that claimant suffered from an occupational disease resulting from repetitive stress is supported by substantial evidence and will not be disturbed (see Matter of Garcia v MCI Interiors, Inc., 158 AD3d 907, 908 [2018]; Matter of Curtis v Xerox, 66 AD3d 1106, 1108 [2009]). [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:08 pm
" In light of the foregoing, and given that no contrary medical opinions were presented, the Board's factual determination that claimant suffered from an occupational disease resulting from repetitive stress is supported by substantial evidence and will not be disturbed (see Matter of Garcia v MCI Interiors, Inc., 158 AD3d 907, 908 [2018]; Matter of Curtis v Xerox, 66 AD3d 1106, 1108 [2009]). [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 4:00 am
Or is it important to keep up the pretense that precedent matters either so the justices might at some subconscious level be more restrained or because if we allow the Court to decide each issue anew without the pretense that prior law matters the rule of law will be seriously damaged? [read post]
