Search for: "Matter of Jones v Jones" Results 321 - 340 of 3,020
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jan 2022, 10:52 pm by Sophia Tang
By contrast, courts in California and Canada have found a contractual jurisdiction and applicable law clause invalid as a matter of public policy in order to allow a class action privacy claim to proceed against Facebook.[6] In England, the dual challenge of jurisdiction and collective actions in a mass privacy infringement claim has presented itself before the English Courts, first in Vidal-Hall v Google before the Court of Appeal in 2015[7] and in the Supreme Court judgment of… [read post]
1 Jan 2022, 12:23 pm by Deborah J. Merritt
Jones 2012); the location of a cell phone (Carpenter v. [read post]
9 Dec 2021, 4:34 pm by Noam Biale
In other words, it does not matter if the prisoner is actually innocent, as the lower courts found in the case of Barry Lee Jones. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 2:13 pm
That was a reference to the opinions by Justices Pleicones and Hearn, who wanted to change the "neutral principles" rule laid down in All Saints Waccamaw to a "complete deference to the national church" rule of Watson v. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 9:28 am by Leesfield Scolaro
  As a general legal matter, Jones Act claims cannot be removed to federal court. [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 11:24 am by Public Employment Law Press
Turning first to the request by petitioners to proceed with this matter as a class action (CPLR 901), we note that when governmental operations are involved, and when subsequent petitioners will be adequately protected under the principles of stare decisis, class actions are inappropriate (Matter of Jones v Berman, 37 N.Y.2d 42). [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 11:24 am by Public Employment Law Press
Turning first to the request by petitioners to proceed with this matter as a class action (CPLR 901), we note that when governmental operations are involved, and when subsequent petitioners will be adequately protected under the principles of stare decisis, class actions are inappropriate (Matter of Jones v Berman, 37 N.Y.2d 42). [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 9:52 am by Eugene Volokh
If you learn your colleague Mary Jones has accused your mutual employer of sexual harassment, you may not want to be legally bound to indefinitely keep that secret fact segregated from all the other things you know about Jones, and all the other things you might say about her to coworkers or friends. [read post]