Search for: "Matter of M. M. v A. A."
Results 321 - 340
of 15,505
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2024, 10:25 am
Chandler v. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 5:00 am
” (For the non-lawyers, I’m referring to this classic case). [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 4:00 am
On Wednesday, I received a letter from Bryan M. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 6:55 pm
In Guedes v. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 9:36 am
” M & G Polymers USA, LLC v. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 6:32 am
” Similarly, “[m]ergers resulting in unconcentrated markets are unlikely to have adverse competitive effects and ordinarily require no further analysis. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 5:01 am
I'm delighted to pass along this item from Prof. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 4:36 am
Alexander M. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 11:32 am
It's more complicated, and definitions matter a lot, including for intellectual property law. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 1:40 am
The Sedlik v. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 5:58 pm
Dakota v. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 5:58 pm
Nov. 30, 2023). [1] 20 NYCRR 132.18(a). [2] Zelinsky v Tax Appeals Trib., 1 NY3d 85 (2003). [3] 20 NYCRR 132.18(a). [4] See TSB-M-06(5)I (May 15, 2006). [5] S. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 4:31 pm
I'm certain that there are many people who would categorically agree with Justice Poochigian when he says in this opinion:"The interests of justice are not furthered by excluding truthful, relevant evidence needed to prosecute criminals. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 4:30 am
And of course, we know that this reactionary Court has its sights set on delegation because allowing broad delegation facilitates regulation, which is, of course, the ultimate target.Although I am always happy to be corrected when I'm mistaken and to acknowledge my errors, my characterization of Justice Kavanaugh's handwringing over unilateral agency action and paean to bicameralism and presentment probably was not mistaken--and certainly was not mistaken in any way that… [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm
See, e.g., Schmuck v. [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 12:30 pm
I’m basically going to convert my presentation into this blog post. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 11:11 pm
V. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 11:47 am
” ( See Brownell v. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
McCormick of the Court of Chancery addressed an issue of first impression in Crispo v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 12:47 pm
Hovenkamp is right that, as a general matter, Article III judges are not experienced at balancing costs and benefits in the way that general consideration of cross-market efficiencies might suggest. [read post]
