Search for: "Matter of Said v Said" Results 321 - 340 of 30,708
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In the Matter of New York Civil Liberties Union [CLU] v New York City Department of Correction [DOC], 2023 NY Slip Op 00930, the Appellate Division noted that the personal privacy exemption in Public Officers Law §87(2)*allows state agencies to protect sensitive matters "which are of little or no public interest, and which may include unsubstantiated allegations," citing Matter of New York Times Co. v City of New York Off. of the Mayor, 194… [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In the Matter of New York Civil Liberties Union [CLU] v New York City Department of Correction [DOC], 2023 NY Slip Op 00930, the Appellate Division noted that the personal privacy exemption in Public Officers Law §87(2)*allows state agencies to protect sensitive matters "which are of little or no public interest, and which may include unsubstantiated allegations," citing Matter of New York Times Co. v City of New York Off. of the Mayor, 194… [read post]
30 Dec 2007, 8:03 am
On Thursday, we noted that the Ohio Supreme Court had upheld two tort reform provisions in Arbino v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 1:50 pm by WIMS
Before all is said and done, this confusion and the serious consequences generated by today's opinion may ultimately require resolution by the Supreme Court. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Yes, said the First Circuit, upholding Maine's exclusion of religious schools; no, said the Second Circuit, striking down Vermont's. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 10:42 pm
This remains true even in the event that the parties have consented to the requested fee akin to Matter of Stortecky v Mazzone and Matter of Phelan. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 10:46 pm
This remains true even in the event that the parties have consented to the requested fee akin to Matter of Stortecky v Mazzone and Matter of Phelan. [read post]
24 Dec 2019, 4:29 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
Therefore, we do not present a descriptive comment of the decision and instead move straight to criticisms of the decision and possible arguments that go against the said criticisms.Our task in this endeavour is to explore the justifiability of justifications proffered in the said decision. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 8:38 am
She said the court historically overturns precedent two to three times a session, but that number more recently has hovered around once per session.The high court issued 58 opinions in 2022, a low number compared to numbers from prior years.On oral argument, she said such argument matters, and has swayed her decision in the past. [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 9:22 pm
"Media Challenges Judge Over OJ Jury SecrecyStephens Media, LLC v. [read post]
3 Dec 2021, 7:57 am
 But I think he wanted solid conservative scholars on the Court, and that mattered far more than actually getting Roe v. [read post]