Search for: "Mays v. Social Security Administration"
Results 321 - 340
of 2,519
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jan 2022, 1:49 pm
For example, the administration must rescind Trump-era rules that weakened protections for beneficiaries of government-funded social services by eliminating requirements that religious providers refer individuals who ask for a secular alternative and notify individuals of their rights. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 9:01 pm
The Social Security Administration, for example, applies a place-of-residence rule when determining whether an individual can apply for benefits based a spouse’s earning records. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 1:41 pm
Cal. 2009) (Allowed discovery of the policies and procedures of insurer related to Social Security Administration determinations. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 8:41 am
Case citation: LabMD v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm
The Strategy positions cybersecurity very clearly as a critical national security issue and builds on the Administration’s issuance of the May 2021 Executive Order on Improving the Nation’s Cybersecurity that created the ONCD as well as its creation of a new Deputy National Security Advisor for Cyber and Emerging Technology position on the National Security Council. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 10:00 pm
W.K. secured the position by way of a nationwide program known as the National Resident Matching Program (NRMP), wherein the parties are bound by the match, and solely NRMP may waive the assignment.When the hospital learned that W.K. had published anti-Semitic social media posts and that he had been the subject of disciplinary action and suspended by his university for some three months, the hospital sought a waiver from the NRMP, which denied the request. [read post]
12 Oct 2023, 9:34 am
The SEC urged the court not to stay final rules adopted in May (Chamber of Commerce of the USA v. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 12:15 am
By statute, the OEC has a duty “[t]o monitor and counteract false or misleading information regarding the electoral process that is published online or on other platforms and that may suppress voter participation or cause confusion and disruption of the orderly and secure administration of elections. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 8:01 pm
Some drivers may be lulled into a false sense of security as they become reliant on their V2V systems that do not warn them of pedestrians, animals, or vehicles without V2V systems. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 10:45 am
Two weeks ago, the Supreme Court heard a case, United States v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 6:44 am
In Riley v. [read post]
3 May 2023, 2:20 am
Cite this article as: Frank Cranmer, "The Missionary’s Position in the 2020s: Ossewaarde v Russia" in Law & Religion UK, 3 May 2023, https://lawandreligionuk.com/2023/05/03/the-missionarys-position-in-the-2020s-ossewaarde-v-russia/ [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 11:51 am
To remind us that legislators may appeal to their own moral convictions and to claims about social utility to reshape the law as they think it should be in the future. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 7:28 pm
Section 405(g) provides that “[a]ny individual, after any final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security made after a hearing to which he was a party, … may obtain review of such decision by a civil action. [read post]
14 May 2012, 3:13 am
K 235 C438 2010 Legal and political theory in the post-national age : selected papers presented at the Second Central and Eastern European Forum for Legal, Political and Social Theorists (Budapest, 21-22 May 2010 Peter Cserne, Miklo? [read post]
7 May 2013, 4:26 am
Federal law may be around the corner. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 11:31 pm
See Foltz v. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 5:37 pm
Access to recorded classes will be controlled via a secure course management platform, such as ANGEL, and will be restricted to students enrolled in the recorded course, the professor, and those University IIT personnel necessary to maintain the system. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
But U.S. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 5:00 pm
For instance, in the Sixth Circuit’s opinion in Glenn, the court considered, in addition to the claimed conflict of interest, the administrator’s encouragement of the plaintiff to seek out Social Security benefits; the administrator’s allegedly incomplete review of the medical evidence; and the plan’s rejection of the treating physician’s assessment. [read post]
