Search for: "McGUIRE v. McGUIRE" Results 321 - 340 of 536
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2008, 12:19 am
Saxe, J.P., Marlow, Buckley, Catterson, McGuire, JJ. _________________________ Judgment, Supreme Court, ... [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
*** In York v McGuire, 63 NY2d 760, the Court of Appeals set out the basic rule concerning the dismissal of probationary employees as follows: “After completing his or her minimum period of probation and prior to completing his or her maximum period of probation, a probationary employee can be dismissed without a hearing and without a statement of reasons, as long as there is no proof that the dismissal was done for a constitutionally impermissible purpose, or in… [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
*** In York v McGuire, 63 NY2d 760, the Court of Appeals set out the basic rule concerning the dismissal of probationary employees as follows: “After completing his or her minimum period of probation and prior to completing his or her maximum period of probation, a probationary employee can be dismissed without a hearing and without a statement of reasons, as long as there is no proof that the dismissal was done for a constitutionally impermissible purpose, or in… [read post]
1 Mar 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In York v McGuire, 63 NY2d 760, the Court of Appeals set out the basic rule concerning the dismissal of probationary employees before the completion of their required probationary period as follows: “After completing his or her minimum period of probation and prior to completing his or her maximum period of probation, a probationary employee can be dismissed without a hearing and without a statement of reasons, as long as there is no proof that the dismissal was done for… [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 3:39 pm by David Kopel
McGuire was not exactly an opponent of gun control. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 3:42 am by Russ Bensing
Dorothy McGuire, on the other hand, is a plaintiff who does not fare well. [read post]