Search for: "Means v. State of Alabama" Results 321 - 340 of 1,487
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The pendency of multiple, interconnected but not always clearly delineated, proceedings means that the Commission or litigants may contend that an issue raised in one of such proceedings should have been raised in another one of the related cases, and the issue is untimely or beyond the scope of the docket in which it is initially raised, further compounding the risks presented by the litigation around the expanded rule. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 9:00 pm by Joanna L. Grossman and Mary Ziegler
Ohio, Alabama, Iowa, and Oklahoma announced similar bans.The impact of these bans is self-evident. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 3:41 pm by admin
CMS created a Disaster State Plan Amendment (SPA) template to allow states to submit one combined request for all temporary changes that states may wish to make to their programs. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 8:43 pm by Chris Castle
Off Shore Pirates Profit by Interfering in US Markets Unlike the historical pirates who were declared hostis humani generis under admiralty law, or the modern pirates who hijack cargo ships such as the Maersk Alabama and are stopped by Operation Allied Protector, digital pirates defy the nation state relatively openly and brazenly. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 3:55 am by Chris Seaton
Now an algorithm had the discretion thanks to a state mandate, and that algorithm assigned Judge Waters the case of Bishop v. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 8:34 pm by Eugene Volokh
Alabama, 326 U.S. 501, 505–09 (1946) (company town). [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 12:10 pm by ricelawmd_3p2zve
The justices in the Court of Appeals of Maryland admitted it is unpopular but declined to change it in the 2013 hearing of Coleman v. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 11:30 am by John Elwood
Hardison opining that “undue hardship” simply means something more than a “de minimis cost” should be disavowed or overruled. [read post]