Search for: "Michael Harris v. State" Results 321 - 340 of 772
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2016, 3:12 am by Amy Howe
United States ex rel. [read post]
19 Jun 2016, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Canada Canada is undergoing a surveillance crisis, argues Michael Geist. [read post]
30 May 2016, 1:52 am by INFORRM
We also note that, on 20 May 2016, Laws LJ gave permission to appeal against the decision of Sir Michael Tugendhat on the issue of privilege ([2015] EWHC 3677 (QB)) in the case of Lachaux v Independent Print. [read post]
26 May 2016, 9:29 pm by Ron Coleman
Michael Keyes (@JMichaelKeyes) May 24, 2016 [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 6:35 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Information in police disciplinary files often qualifies as impeachment evidence which, under Brady v. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
Evan Harris also condemned these changes as “all “press release” and no “press regulation,” and questioned why IPSO did not consult the public over these changes “and instead negotiated in secret with a secretive industry body. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 6:13 am
Sullivan, Ropes & Gray LLP, on Sunday, January 17, 2016 Tags: Compliance and disclosure interpretation, Derivatives, Investment Company Act, Investor protection, Leverage,Mutual funds, No-action letters, Private funds, Risk, Risk management, Rule 18f-4, SEC, SEC rulemaking, Securities Regulation, Swaps PECO v. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 11:51 am by Lyle Denniston
Carvin for petitioners (Art Lien) Those are the Justices who made up the majority in a five-to-four ruling in 2014, Harris v. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 4:09 am by SHG
It stems from a Supreme Court decision from 1989, DeShaney v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 12:31 pm by Lyle Denniston
 A majority of the Justices joined in the critique, most strongly expressed in 2014 in Harris v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am by Ben
  A New York federal judge agreed to certify an interlocutory appeal by SiriusXM against the ruling that gave state copyright law protection to pre-1972 sound recordings. [read post]