Search for: "Michael Sample v. State" Results 321 - 340 of 417
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Feb 2011, 10:59 pm by Graeme Hall
See today’s In the courts Luton Borough Council & Nottingham City Council & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Education [2011] EWHC 217 (Admin) (11 February 2011): Coalition cancellation of school-building program was unlawful. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 11:42 am by WSLL
Michael Vang, Fleener & Vang, Laramie, Wyoming.Representing Appellee (Defendant): Bruce A. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 9:09 am by WSLL
Lozano, State Public Defender; Tina N. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 6:29 pm by Sonia Katyal
This week, my colleague, Jeanne Fromer, and myself had the pleasure of hosting a Tri-State conference on Intellectual Property at Fordham Law School. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:50 am by Aaron
http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/840393.no1.pdf State v. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 1:41 pm by Betsy McKenzie
That turns out to be Michael Moulton, who produced electronic textbooks for Faulkner Press, which unsuccessfully sued the for-profit note site Einstein's Notes (Faulkner Press v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 10:22 pm by legalinformatics
Michael Chambers, Bound by No Law, No Soul, No Anything at All: Bridging Constructions of Corporate Personhood by Reformers Past and Present. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 9:58 pm by Lyonette Louis-Jacques
The sample nearest in shade supplies the applicable rule. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 12:50 pm by Adam Levitin
Last week the US Bankruptcy Court for the District of New Jersey issued an opinion in a case captioned Kemp v. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 11:44 am by Jack McNeill, Associate Library Director
Application of the remedial purpose canon to CERCLA successor liability issues after United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2010, 7:45 pm by cdw
” [via LexisOne] Michael Dewayne Smith v. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 3:07 am by Marie Louise
(Docket Report) District Court N D Illinois: Loosely related state law claims sufficient for supplemental jurisdiction: Von Holdt v. [read post]