Search for: "Michigan v. Stevens" Results 321 - 340 of 536
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Aug 2024, 9:14 pm by Steven Calabresi
Packing the Supreme Court is thus a key issue in the 2024 presidential and senatorial elections, as GOP Senate candidates running in red or purple states like Montana, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan, Nevada, and Arizona should make clear. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 6:19 am
At Crime and Consequences Blog, Kent Scheidegger recaps a recent Michigan Law Review essay on the DNA testimony at issue in McDaniel v. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 10:55 pm
Berghuis     Eastern District of Michigan at Detroit   08a0410p.06  Howard Frank v. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 3:19 pm by David Lat
Schwarzenegger – alongside David Boies, his former adversary from Bush v. [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
In last week’s Supreme Court ruling in Patchak v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 3:13 pm by Mark Walsh
Retired Justice John Paul Stevens enters and takes the VIP seat next to Reporter of Decisions Christine L. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 2:55 pm by Tom Goldstein
joined by Scalia, Stevens, Breyer, and Sotomayor, over the dissent of Roberts, Kennedy, Ginsburg, and Alito. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 2:48 pm
  Stevens’ concurring opinion took a narrow view of the dispute, but found the Michigan law valid. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 8:03 am
Justice John Paul Stevens was in the majority on result only; he expressed different reasons for the outcome. [read post]