Search for: "Miller v. Superior Court"
Results 321 - 340
of 459
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2015, 7:29 am
Subsequently, Green’s relations with his superiors soured. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 11:51 am
Superior Court (2003) 113 Cal.App.4th 1, 13 [CEQA petitioners, as the parties “with the most to gain from any underinclusion,” bear “the burden of showing prejudice from any overinclusion of materials into the administrative record”]; Stockton Citizens For Sensible Planning v. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 2:42 pm
The Superior Court of Alameda County (Elizabeth Brazil, Real Party in Interest) (2015) ___ Cal.App.4th ___, 2015 WL 4594095. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 8:13 am
Group, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 6:37 am
(For more of Justice Quinn’s particular style, Miller v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 12:10 pm
Jensen v. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 6:55 am
Buckman Co. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 12:27 pm
Miller as pinging simply is not part and parcel of the provision of cellular phone service”). [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 1:35 pm
The Court held, as a matter of law (citing Creed-21 v. [read post]
20 Feb 2025, 12:18 pm
App. ___, 906 S.E.2d 538, 541 (2024) (concluding that a judge in a Miller v. [read post]
3 Jan 2022, 11:29 am
Superior Court (1995) 9 Cal.4th 559, 566-568.) [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
Several lower court decisions had done so explicitly: Overton v. [read post]
23 Aug 2021, 4:42 pm
City of Los Angeles etc. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 7:59 pm
This is the site I will always come to when I need a second opinion authentic ryan kalil mens jersey “Aspiring journalist Brigid makes headlinesA LOVE of language and a nose for news has earned Brigid Auchettl this year’s The Standard Journalism Prize The details are part of a court filing explaining why a judge moved Kenan Adams Kinard, 16, to protective adult custody rather than returning him to juvenile detention before he and Demetruis Glenn, also 16, were formally charged… [read post]
19 May 2016, 11:43 am
Finally, it appears that the review procedure does not apply to sentences to life with parole under North Carolina’s Miller v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 11:43 am
Finally, it appears that the review procedure does not apply to sentences to life with parole under North Carolina’s Miller v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 5:00 am
The Supreme Court reversed, holding that a subordinate of a government employee may refuse to comply with a subpoena relating to his work “on the ground that the subordinate is prohibited from making such submission by his superior. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 1:57 am
In R. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 11:37 am
The Superior Court, Orange County, No. 05CC04248, Andrew P. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 12:44 pm
The Court noted its analysis was “compatible with North County Advocates v. [read post]
