Search for: "Modified Opinion filed 3/1/10"
Results 321 - 340
of 729
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Nov 2010, 3:48 pm
No. 3:10-CV-178. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 3:00 am
” In its opinion, the Court describes BLM’s history of modifying the waste definition over a span of three years without providing proper scientific evidence to support modifying the rules implementing the Mineral Leasing Act. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 7:02 am
Briefing shall consist of a motion, an opposition filed within 15 days of the motion, and a reply filed within 10 days of the opposition. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 7:46 am
Members Kaplan and Ring dissented from the majority opinion. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 7:46 am
Members Kaplan and Ring dissented from the majority opinion. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 6:46 pm
§§ 991, 994, and 995(a)(1). 3. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 9:14 pm
However, TERPAN replied that the Kit had been modified over time and that the version marketed in 2012 did not correspond to the invention that was the object of the application filed. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 12:56 pm
P. 93(10), 185; Vance v. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 1:50 pm
Removed the significant nexus standard from the tributaries provisions in 40 CFR 120.2(a)(3) and 33 CFR 328.3(a)(3). [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:39 am
Accordingly, the district court modified the definition of the class as noted above, and granted the motion for class certification only with respect to 10 of the 92 restaurant locations. [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 11:17 am
Post-grant procedures and other quality enhancements.Sec. 10. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 10:13 am
This means a long-forgotten web page last modified over a decade ago can still support a lawsuit if a single viewer accessed the page within 3 years before the lawsuit. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 3:18 am
Under that provision, a step three grievance must be filed within 10 days of the employee’s receipt of a back-to-work order. [read post]
19 May 2012, 11:01 am
In the present case, it is not disputed that the originally filed European patent application on which the patent in suit was granted discloses the term “boundary portion” of granted claim 1. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 2:12 pm
Member Kaplan dissented in part from the majority opinion with respect to the standard that would allow the Board to issue the remedial bargaining orders more easily when an employer has engaged in conduct that could be classified as a ULP under 8(a)(3) or (1), and classified that portion of the majority opinion as dicta given that the employer in Cemex engaged in over 20 unfair labor practices, not one or a few. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 5:07 pm
1. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 9:44 pm
Plaintiffs also argued that documents were modified even after notice of litigation and that defendants made no document retention efforts after the lawsuit was filed. [read post]
11 May 2011, 6:51 am
For now, she directed the bank to file its dismissal motion on June 3. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 11:04 pm
The parties agreed that the “presumptive limitations” for latches in this case is 3 years, based on Section 8106 of Title 10 of the Delaware Code. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 8:20 am
This investment worked as follows: (1) an entity called the Richard L. [read post]
