Search for: "Moore v. Circuit Court" Results 321 - 340 of 1,897
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2011, 9:51 am by Kent Scheidegger
Bill has already noted the Supreme Court's summary, unanimous reversal of the Ninth Circuit this morning in Felkner v. [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 1:51 am
Page 2 RONALD LEE GILMAN, Circuit Judge, with whom MARTIN, DAUGHTREY, MOORE, COLE, and CLAY, Circuit Judges, join, dissenting from the denial of rehearing en banc. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 1:44 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Judge Moore wrote the opinion for the court, joined by Judge Cole. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 12:45 pm
(Howard Bashman of How Appealing blog alerted us to this unusual plea by the Circuit Court, and provided  this link to the Circuit order in Seale v. [read post]
21 Jul 2009, 10:34 am
Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit ruled in an unpublished decision issued on July 15 that U.S. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 10:08 am
The Court summarily reversed the Sixth Circuit (Merritt, Martin, Moore) in the case of David Bobby (I guess that’s Ricky’s brother), Warden v. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 9:30 pm by Florian Mueller
On the first day after a long Thanksgiving weekend, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied, without stating any particular reasons, a petition filed by Samsung earlier this month for a further rehearing en banc in an Apple v. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 5:00 am by Jon Robinson
The Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit, determined that the M/V CROWN CASINO was not a vessel for maritime purposes. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 6:01 am by Kit Case
United States Supreme Court Today’s post comes from guest author Jon Rehm from Rehm, Bennett & Moore. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 6:37 am
Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit recently issued in a civil case:  West Management of Washington, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 7:56 am by Dennis Crouch
Cir. 2014) This case should be seen as a follow-on to Judge Moore’s recent decision in X2Y Attenuators v. [read post]
9 Nov 2006, 5:52 am
But cf 12 Moore's Federal Practice--Civil § 59.33 (2006) (stating only that "[a]rguably" the court has this authority). [read post]