Search for: "Morrison v. Morrison" Results 321 - 340 of 2,252
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2014, 10:09 am by Sandy
The Second Circuit as  a matter  of first impression, considered whether the bar on extraterritorial application of the United States securities laws, as set forth in Morrison v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 2:23 pm by jleaming@acslaw.org
Morrison, Lerner Family Association Dean for Public Interest & Public Service at George Washington University Law School The Supreme Court today by a vote of 5-3 upheld most of the rulings of the lower federal courts that Arizona’s efforts to supplement federal enforcement of federal immigration law was preempted by that law. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 7:19 am by Christine Hurt
The Glom is very excited to have Hannah Buxbaum, Executive Associate Dean for Academic Affairs and Professor of Law at Indiana University Maurer School of Law, as a guest blogger to give us the scoop on Monday's Supreme Court case Morrison v. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 4:43 am by Amy Howe
Briefly: In The Huffington Post, Alan Morrison weighs in on Evenwel v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 10:17 am by Hannah Buxbaum
In pre-decision speculation, I wondered whether the Supreme Court would foreclose not only f-cubed cases, but all cases involving foreign-market transactions -- even those affecting U.S. investors. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 6:37 am by Hannah Buxbaum
A bright-line test limiting the application of U.S. securities law to transactions that occur within the United States is hard to swallow for one reason I mentioned yesterday: it would exclude the claims of American investors, not just foreign investors, who bought securities of foreign issuers in foreign transactions. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 6:08 am by Guest Blogger
Morrison Much has been written about two recent decisions, one striking down the section of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) that denies federal benefits to same sex couples, who are legally married under the laws of their state, that are available to opposite sex married couples (Gill v. [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 1:00 pm
Here's another big firm -- this time, Morrison & Foerster -- taking on pro bono-ish representation of a plaintiff and then requesting a hefty award of attorney's fees.MoFo, and it's high-profile partner Arturo Gonzalez -- represented a dispatcher for the City of Taft Police Department who alleged that she was sexually harassed. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 1:35 pm by Anna Christensen
City of Chicago, Morrison v. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 8:54 am by CJLF Staff
Lee  and the California Supreme Court's 2010 holding in Krishna v. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 1:44 pm by John Bellinger
The panel majority rejected the defendants’ argument that Kiobel had adopted the “focus test” enunciated in Morrison v. [read post]