Search for: "Mr. Arnold"
Results 321 - 340
of 1,688
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2017, 1:06 am
No doubt this will be influenced by the Duran Duran case, which was granted leave to appeal by Mr Justice Arnold earlier this month. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 6:30 am
Given that the Court of Appeal in this case reached its decision in favour of Mr Wood with reference to the Supreme Court’s 2015 decision in (Arnold v Britton & Ors [2015] UKSC 36), which held (in brief) that business common sense only had a part to play where the meaning of a term is ambiguous, how the Court’s decision in this case aligns with its recent decision in Arnold will be of keen interest to contract lawyers and litigators alike. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 10:51 am
Mr. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 7:23 am
Mr. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 3:41 am
However the quotes are often not identical to what was originally said in due to the process of transmission and public adoption.The trademark licensing question that won't go away: the standing of a licensee to sueKat friend Taapsi Johri of K&S Partners, Gurgaon, India, shared this report of an Indian court decision that found that jurisdiction of a court in a suit for infringement cannot be claimed based on the place of business of a “permitted user” of the trademark in… [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 8:20 pm
Mr. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 11:25 pm
In the first instance proceedings before Mr Justice Birss, Wobben claimed that the defendants (collectively Siemens) had infringed the patent by installing wind turbines at a number of off-shore sites. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 8:14 am
The appellate decision notes that Mr. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 9:59 am
Ironically, at least with respect to the President-elect’s reported wide-spread use of NDAs, one adverse consequence of NDA overreach is that such agreements can be used to prevent people from getting better jobs and moving-up the ladder of social mobility, a central promise of Mr. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 1:02 am
This post is based on an Arnold & Porter publication by Mr. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 8:35 am
How two years flies past | Gilead triumphant as Court of Appeal upholds Arnold J in Idenix's Sovaldi appeal | BREAKING: CJEU follows AG and holds French law on out-of-print books contrary to EU law | Again on the first post-GS Media national decision | Top 5 things IP lawyers must remember about English contract law | Monday Miscellany | Around the IP Blogs [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 2:11 pm
In all these senses, Mr. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 4:44 am
GuestKat Eibhlin Vardy answers the questions by referring to Mr. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 5:16 pm
Arnold, CFLS, AAML [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 3:44 pm
Mr. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 11:58 pm
Just over a year ago, AIPPI hosted a Rapid Response seminar following Mr Justice Arnold finding that the material claims of Warner-Lambert’s patent for the use of pregabalin in the treatment of pain were invalid and in any event not infringed by Actavis’ skinny label pregabalin product Lecaent (Warner-Lambert v Actavis [2015] EWHC 2548 (Pat)). [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 3:47 am
However in a High Court ruling last week, Mr Justice Arnold ruled “not without hesitation” that the contractual interpretation suggested by Gloucester Place was the correct one, and that the “parties' intention was that the 'entire copyrights' in the compositions should vest, and remain vested, in the claimant (Gloucester Place) for the 'full term' of the copyrights. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 6:50 am
Gloucester Place Music Ltd v Le Bon & Ors [2016] EWHC 3091 (Ch) (02 December 2016) is a relatively short (45 paragraph) judgment of Mr Justice Arnold, in his own words 'not without hesitation'. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 3:30 am
Last week saw another Michaelmas decision from Mr Justice Arnold in the Patents Court in the form of Merck Sharpe and Dohme Limited v Shionogi & Co Limited [2016] EWHC 2989 (Pat). [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 7:38 pm
Panellists: Mr Alberto Bellan (Hogan Lovells), Mr Pierre-Olivier Lesburgueres (IFRRO), Dr Cédric Manara (Google))16:30-16:50 - Coffee Break16:50-17:50 - KEYNOTE: Sir Richard Arnold (Judge of the High Court of England and Wales – Chancery Division)17:50-18:50 - Panel Discussion: The present and future of UK Copyright (Moderator: Mr Darren Meale (Simmons & and IPEC Deputy… [read post]
