Search for: "Muse v. Muse" Results 321 - 340 of 1,184
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2018, 7:49 am by Christopher G. Hill
  If so look no farther than Crawford Construction & General Contractors Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 8:54 am by Stephen Pitel
  In Haaretz.com v Goldhar (available here) the court held (in a 6-3 decision) that the plaintiff’s libel proceedings in Ontario should be stayed because Israel is the clearly more appropriate forum. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 6:07 am by Christopher G. Hill
Today at Construction Law Musings, we’re back to a discussion of mechanic’s liens. [read post]
4 May 2018, 6:00 am by Christopher G. Hill
For example, in a recent case out of Fairfax County, Artitech, Inc. v. [read post]
3 May 2018, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
On the other hand, both Erwin and Geof were very clear to highlight the ways in which university authorities can and should protect individuals from true threats, from harassment (which has a legal definition focused on how targeted and persistent a particular course of offensive expressive conduct is) and from defamation.Three of us then mused about why many (most?) [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 8:48 am by Thomas Surmanski
I don’t have one on speed dial let alone a number memorized” you muse to yourself. [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 4:26 am
Finally, IP Draughts muses on case law trawling and argues that legal firms providing case law reports need to get better at explaining the context and importance of a case. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 6:48 am
There were also philosophical musings on the relevance of literary criticism to patent interpretation, reports on trade mark cases in Italy and Singapore and a copyright book review. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 6:00 am by Christopher G. Hill
Also, please subscribe to keep up with the latest Construction Law Musings. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 1:36 pm by Christopher G. Hill
A good examination of the interplay between fraud and contract was set out by the Eastern District of Virginia federal court in Zuberi et al v. [read post]