Search for: "NO PARTY v. NO PARTY" Results 321 - 340 of 119,762
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2018, 6:03 pm by Steven J. Tinnelly, Esq.
  In January 2018, the California Court of Appeal addressed that issue in the case of Artus v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 4:28 am
An entity not a party to a collective bargaining agreement negotiated pursuant to the Taylor Law may not be bound by its termsMatter of Council of School Supervisors & Adm'rs, Local 1 v New York City Dept. of Educ., 2011 NY Slip Op 06451, Appellate Division, First Department The Council filed a contract grievance in response to a city-wide plan applicable to all city agencies that reduced the number of parking permits issued to municipal workers for parking on city… [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 2:27 pm by Hyemin Han
District Judge Amit Mehta dismissed Trump v. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 6:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
In the notable Lawrence County Court of Common Pleas decision of Pavelko v. [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 5:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
While the states were seen as “laboratories of democracy” by Justice Brandeis in New State Ice Company v Liebmann – in recent years states have become “laboratories of national partisan politics,” to adopt Jessica Bulman-Pozen’s gloss on Brandeis. [read post]
10 May 2016, 7:56 am by Sally-Ann Underhill
” The recent decision of the Court of Appeal in Globe Motors Inc., et al. v TRW Lucas Varity Electric Steering Ltd., et al. [2016] EWCA Civ 396, considered the impact of similar clauses, in that case one which provided “Entire agreement; amendment: This Agreement, which includes the Appendices hereto, is the only agreement between the Parties relating to the subject matter hereof. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 7:00 am
Here's the last line: "If Democrats want to regain the Catholic vote, they must treat abortion as a moral issue, work for its continued reduction and articulate a more nuanced message than, 'We support Roe v. [read post]