Search for: "National Federation of Federal Employees v. United States" Results 321 - 340 of 3,011
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jan 2022, 1:16 pm
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES _________________ Nos. 21A244 and 21A247 _________________ NATIONAL FEDERATION OF INDEPENDENT BUSINESS, ET AL., APPLICANTS 21A244 v.DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, ET AL. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 3:45 pm by Bennett Cyphers
Babel Street is “widely used” by the military, intelligence agencies, private companies, and federal, state, and local law enforcement. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 7:46 am by Beth Graham
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit has ruled a federal district court committed error when it ordered JPMorgan Chase Bank to notify thousands of current and former employees who signed an arbitration agreement waiving their right to engage in collective action against the company about a pending class action case. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
Steager, which asks whether federal law or the doctrine of intergovernmental tax immunity prevents West Virginia from differential taxation of retirement benefits of certain former state and federal employees. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 9:42 pm by H. Scott Leviant
A class was certified.After the United States Supreme Court issued AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 11:54 am by David Super
§ 1361, federal courts may issue writs of “mandamus to compel an officer or employee of the United States or any agency thereof to perform a duty owed to the plaintiff. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 1:27 pm by Steven Boutwell
By Scott Huffstetler Today, the United States Supreme Court decided to consider three decisions involving class-action waivers in employee arbitration agreements. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 5:39 am
United States and Weyhrauch v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 10:26 am by Ruthann Robson
  Lane is not the only one to argue that the Eleventh Circuit’s categorical exclusion of First Amendment protection for subpoenaed testimony is incorrect:  the Solicitor General, representing the United States as an amicus, agrees with him. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 8:39 am by Richard Renner
This decision applies only to those employees who work for private companies in the United States and have a right to organize a union. [read post]