Search for: "Nichols v. State"
Results 321 - 340
of 613
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2013, 10:47 am
In holding this to unpatentable, Nicholls LJ stated at 327 that “his program makes a more efficient use of a computer's resources. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 4:43 am
District Court for the Southern District of New York found that the 2010 amendment to Rule 14a-8(i)(8) did not change its original holding in Lucian Bebchuk v Electronic Arts. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 4:00 am
Awad v. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 12:30 pm
Id.; (citing Nichols v. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 2:54 am
Scholastic Inc. v Harris, 259 F3d 73, 85-86 [2d Cir 2001]; Johnson v Kennedy, 350 Mass 294, 298, 214 NE2d 276, 278 [1966]; Posner v Miller, 356 Mich 6, 9, 96 NW2d 110, 111-112 [1959]; Nicholes v Hunt, 273 Or 255, 261-262, 541 P2d 820, 823-824 [1975]; Willman v Beheler, 499 SW2d 770, 775 [Mo 1973]; Fisher v Fisher, 83 Cal App 2d 357, 360, 188 P2d 802, 804 [1948]). [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 2:34 am
In the first case, U.S. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 12:44 pm
In its February 14, 2013 decision in Melody M. v Robert M., the Third Department affirmed an order of now-retired St. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 8:45 am
Co. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 12:48 pm
Trust v. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 6:18 am
This principle was explained most notably by Judge Learned Hand in the 1930 case Nichols v Universal Pictures: It is of course essential to any protection of literary property, whether at common-law or under the statute, that the right cannot be limited literally to the text, else a plagiarist would escape by immaterial variations. [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 5:14 am
Kuddus v Chief Constable ([2002] 2 AC 122), the highly respected senior Law Lord, Lord Nicholls said “From time to time cases do arise where awards of compensatory damages are perceived as inadequate to achieve a just result between the parties. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 2:41 pm
Nichols v. [read post]
12 Nov 2012, 7:59 am
In Lyon v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 5:07 pm
Sir Robin Jacob (who retired from the Court of Appeal last year but was making one of his occasional reappearances) in giving the leading judgment noted Lord Nicholls in Mercedes Benz v Leiduck [1996] AC 284, p.308: “The court may grant an injunction against a party properly before it where this is required to avoid injustice […] The court habitually grants injunctions in respect of certain types of conduct. [read post]
College Football Predictions for FBS Week 3 2012 by SportPundit and the Yards Per Play System YPPSYS
10 Sep 2012, 12:12 pm
Result: Morgan State v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 11:06 am
Implications for Commercial Anti-Bribery Laws"; Philip Nichols, University of Pennsylvania, "An International Norm for Corporate Criminal Liability for Bribery"; and Karen Halverson Cross (right), John Marshall-Chicago, "Arbitration of Mass Sovereign Debt Claims: Abaclat v. [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 1:36 pm
That is one of the issues that Madam Justice Fitzpatrick was asked to decide in Tassone v. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 6:16 am
Calilfornia Cal by 11.5 California 31-27 California 28-17 Nicholls State v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 9:14 pm
The concept of eminent domain came to the forefront in 2005 when the United States Supreme Court handed down its decision in Kelo v. [read post]
29 Jul 2012, 7:26 am
In Salinier v. [read post]
